Logical indexing cell array

3 Ansichten (letzte 30 Tage)
azarang asadi
azarang asadi am 27 Mai 2022
Kommentiert: azarang asadi am 30 Mai 2022
I have a cell array as follows:
array =
5×4 cell array
{[ 0.5000]} {[ 0.0250]} {[0.4000]} {[ 0.0150]}
{[ 0.0500]} {[ 0.0300]} {[0.0600]} {[ 0.0120]}
{0×0 double} {[ 0.1500]} {[0.0500]} {[ 0.0160]}
{0×0 double} {0×0 double} {[0.0400]} {[ 0.1400]}
{0×0 double} {0×0 double} {[0.0300]} {0×0 double}
what I'm trying to identify the members<0.1 so I'm looking for the following:
array2 =
5×4 cell array
{[ 1]} {[ 0]} {[1]} {[ 0]}
{[ 0]} {[ 0]} {[0]} {[ 0]}
{0×0 double} {[ 1]} {[0]} {[ 0]}
{0×0 double} {0×0 double} {[0]} {[ 1]}
{0×0 double} {0×0 double} {[0]} {0×0 double}
and what I want finally is to get only the members that are <0.1 which is the following:
array3 =
5×4 cell array
{0×0 double} {[ 0.0250]} {0×0 double} {[ 0.0150]}
{[ 0.0500]} {[ 0.0300]} {[ 0.0600]} {[ 0.0120]}
{0×0 double} {0×0 double} {[ 0.0500]} {[ 0.0160]}
{0×0 double} {0×0 double} {[ 0.0400]} {0×0 double}
{0×0 double} {0×0 double} {[ 0.0300]} {0×0 double}
How can I do this? :)
  1 Kommentar
Image Analyst
Image Analyst am 28 Mai 2022
Why are you using a cell array for this? I don't see a variety of class types, nor do the cells contain variable/different sized arrays. It should be just a regular numerical array, like a double. See the FAQ:

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Akzeptierte Antwort

Jan
Jan am 27 Mai 2022
Bearbeitet: Jan am 27 Mai 2022
A hint: I takes some time to create your input data such, that it can be used in an example. Please do such tedious editing by your own in future questions. Thanks.
A = {0.5000, 0.0250, 0.4000, 0.0150; ...
0.0500, 0.0300, 0.0600, 0.0120; ...
[] , 0.1500, 0.0500, 0.0160; ...
[], [], 0.0400, 0.1400; ...
[], [], 0.0300, []};
T = cellfun(@(c) any(c < 0.1), A)
T = 5×4 logical array
0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Do you really need this (called "array2" in your question) as a cell array? Logical indices are fine as logical array.
Result = A;
Result(~T) = {[]}
{0×0 double} {[ 0.0250]} {0×0 double} {[ 0.0150]} {[ 0.0500]} {[ 0.0300]} {[ 0.0600]} {[ 0.0120]} {0×0 double} {0×0 double} {[ 0.0500]} {[ 0.0160]} {0×0 double} {0×0 double} {[ 0.0400]} {0×0 double} {0×0 double} {0×0 double} {[ 0.0300]} {0×0 double}
What about doing this directly:
Result = cellfun(@(c) c(c < 0.1), A, 'UniformOutput', false)
{0×0 double} {[ 0.0250]} {0×0 double} {[ 0.0150]} {[ 0.0500]} {[ 0.0300]} {[ 0.0600]} {[ 0.0120]} {0×0 double} {0×0 double} {[ 0.0500]} {[ 0.0160]} {0×0 double} {0×0 double} {[ 0.0400]} {0×0 double} {0×0 double} {0×0 double} {[ 0.0300]} {0×0 double}

Weitere Antworten (1)

Stephen23
Stephen23 am 28 Mai 2022
Bearbeitet: Stephen23 am 28 Mai 2022
That is an inefficient way to store and process that data.
Using one numeric array would be simpler and much more efficient:
M = [0.5,0.025,0.4,0.0150;0.05,0.03,0.06,0.0120;NaN,0.15,0.05,0.0160;NaN,NaN,0.04,0.1400;NaN,NaN,0.03,NaN]
M = 5×4
0.5000 0.0250 0.4000 0.0150 0.0500 0.0300 0.0600 0.0120 NaN 0.1500 0.0500 0.0160 NaN NaN 0.0400 0.1400 NaN NaN 0.0300 NaN
X = M<0.1 % simple and very efficient, unlike anything with cell arrays
X = 5×4 logical array
0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0

Kategorien

Mehr zu Matrix Indexing finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange

Produkte


Version

R2020b

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by