i have a matrix like this: [1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0]
i need to change to: [1 0 0 4 4 4 4 0 2 2 0]
how to make a loop?thanks

1 Kommentar

Image Analyst
Image Analyst am 6 Jan. 2013
Tian, as you can see there are a number of different methods to do that. But I've never done that. It seems like a strange thing to want. Why do you want this output array? What are you going to do with it after you get it? (It's possible you don't really need it, you just think you do.)

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

 Akzeptierte Antwort

Azzi Abdelmalek
Azzi Abdelmalek am 6 Jan. 2013
Bearbeitet: Azzi Abdelmalek am 6 Jan. 2013

0 Stimmen

Improve my previous code speed three times
x=[1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0]
a=find(x);
b=[ 1 diff(a)];
b(b==1)=0;
b(b~=0)=1;
idx=zeros(numel(a),2);
e=1;
c=0;
d=[];
for k=1:numel(a)
e=e+b(k);
c=c*not(b(k))+1;
d(c)=a(k);
idx(e,:)=[d(1) c];
end
for k=1:e
x(idx(k,1):idx(k,1)+idx(k,2)-1)=idx(k,2);
end

3 Kommentare

Tian Lin
Tian Lin am 14 Jan. 2013
Thanks for help! If I have a matrix like this [1 0 0 1 1 0; 0 1 0 1 1 0; ... 0 1 1 0 0 1], that means there are many rows,how to change this:b=[ 1 diff(a)]?
Azzi Abdelmalek
Azzi Abdelmalek am 14 Jan. 2013
y=[1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0;0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 0]
for k1=1:size(y,1)
x=y(k1,:);
a=find(x);
b=[ 1 diff(a)];
b(b==1)=0;
b(b~=0)=1;
idx=zeros(numel(a),2);
e=1;
c=0;
d=[];
for k=1:numel(a)
e=e+b(k);
c=c*not(b(k))+1;
d(c)=a(k);
idx(e,:)=[d(1) c];
end
for k=1:e
x(idx(k,1):idx(k,1)+idx(k,2)-1)=idx(k,2);
end
out(k1,:)=x;
end
Tian Lin
Tian Lin am 15 Jan. 2013
Thank you very much

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Weitere Antworten (6)

Jan
Jan am 6 Jan. 2013

1 Stimme

And finally an improved loop method which is about twice as fast as the vectorized method:
function a = RunLength_IgnoZero_loop2(a)
len = length(a);
c = a(1);
ini = 1;
b = zeros(size(a));
for ii = 2:len
if a(ii) ~= c
if c == 0
ini = ii;
else
b(ini) = ii - ini;
b(ii) = ini - ii;
end
c = a(ii);
end
end
if c ~= 0
b(ini) = len - ini + 1;
end
a = cumsum(b);

4 Kommentare

Jan
Jan am 6 Jan. 2013
Some timings:
x = double(rand(1, 1e6) > 0.8);
tic; for ii = 1:100, y = RunLength_IgnoZero(x); end; toc
% Azzi's method without pre-allocation:
21000 seconds (I ran with loop with 1 iteration only)
% Azzi's method with pre-allocation: idx = zeros(numel(a), 2);
241.4 seconds
% RunLength_IgnoZero_loop1:
47.02 seconds
% Jose-Luis' bwconncomp:
25.07 seconds
% RunLength_IgnoZero_Vec:
7.109 seconds
% RunLength_IgnoZero_loop2:
3.687 seconds
Image Analyst
Image Analyst am 6 Jan. 2013
My method does not allow more than 65563 separate regions, like the ~160,000 your code produces, so I ran it for 1e5 elements instead. Then I figure we'd just multiply by 10 to compare times. The regionprops() & intlut() takes 0.12 seconds for 1e5 elements, and presumably 1.2 seconds if it were able to process more than 65536 regions.
Jan
Jan am 6 Jan. 2013
Bearbeitet: Jan am 6 Jan. 2013
x = double(rand(1, 1e6) > 0.8);
tic; for ii = 1:100, y = FCN(x); end; toc
% RunLength_IgnoZero_loop2:
0.40317 seconds
% Image Analyst's regionprops:
45.40 seconds
(Matlab R2009a/64/Win7/Core2Duo) I assume 0.12 sec means 1 iteration and you are using a modern machine which is 4 times faster than my older processor.
Image Analyst
Image Analyst am 6 Jan. 2013
OK, I didn't notice at first that you were doing the same thing 100 times.

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Roger Stafford
Roger Stafford am 6 Jan. 2013

1 Stimme

Let x be the original row vector of 1's and 0's.
n = length(x);
d = diff([0,x,0]);
f1 = find(d(1:n)>0);
f2 = find(d(2:n+1)<0)+1;
y = zeros(1,n+1);
y([f1,f2]) = [f2-f1,f1-f2];
y = cumsum(y(1:n));
Azzi Abdelmalek
Azzi Abdelmalek am 6 Jan. 2013
Bearbeitet: Azzi Abdelmalek am 6 Jan. 2013

0 Stimmen

clear
x=[1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0]
e=0,c=0,d=[]
for k=1:numel(x)
if x(k)
e=e+not(c)
c=c+1
d=[d k]
idx(e,:)=[d(1) c]
else
c=0
d=[]
end
end
for k=1:size(idx,1)
x(idx(k,1):idx(k,1)+idx(k,2)-1)=idx(k,2)
end

1 Kommentar

Jan
Jan am 6 Jan. 2013
Pre-allocating idx to the maximum possible size increases the speed.

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Image Analyst
Image Analyst am 6 Jan. 2013

0 Stimmen

Very simple. No loop needed. You just reassign it:
m = [1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0]
% Now make it into what you want:
m = [1 0 0 4 4 4 4 0 2 2 0]
If you have some other algorithm then let's hear it. For example, leave the first element alone but take the next contiguous stretch of 1's and multiply them by 4, and take the next stretch and multiply them by 2. I couldn't figure out what algorithm you were applying, and you didn't say, and didn't say how general you needed this to be (for example can m have values other than 0 and 1, or can it be other lengths, or can it be 2D or 3D?).

2 Kommentare

Azzi Abdelmalek
Azzi Abdelmalek am 6 Jan. 2013
I guess 4 is the number of consecutive 1 in the array, then 2 is the number of consecutive 1, and so on
Image Analyst
Image Analyst am 6 Jan. 2013
Bearbeitet: Image Analyst am 6 Jan. 2013
Oh, thanks Azzi, I didn't notice that. In that case, you can use bwlabel, regionprops, and intlut:
m = logical([1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 0])
% Group into connected regions.
labeledArray = bwlabel(m)
% Measure the area of all regions.
measurements = regionprops(labeledArray, 'Area');
areas = [measurements.Area]
numberOfAreas = length(areas);
% Assign each connected area with its area.
% Make a look up table to map each region number into the area of that region.
lookUpTable = uint16([0 areas, zeros(1,65536-numberOfAreas-1)]);
% Do the actual mapping.
output = intlut(uint16(labeledArray), lookUpTable)
(Requires the Image Processing Toolbox.) This should also work with 2D arrays.

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Jan
Jan am 6 Jan. 2013
Bearbeitet: Jan am 6 Jan. 2013

0 Stimmen

An inplace method, which changes the input vector on the fly without storing an index list - this muight be an advantage for large data sets:
function a = RunLength_IgnoZero_loop1(a)
len = length(a);
c = a(1);
ini = 1;
for ii = 2:len
if a(ii) ~= c
if c == 0
ini = ii;
else
a(ini:ii-1) = ii - ini;
end
c = a(ii);
end
end
% care about last segement:
if c ~= 0
a(ini:len) = len - ini + 1;
end
Jan
Jan am 6 Jan. 2013
Bearbeitet: Jan am 6 Jan. 2013

0 Stimmen

For the test data x = double(rand(1, 1e6) > 0.8) this vectorized method is 9 times faster than my loop approach:
function a = RunLength_IgnoZero_Vec(a)
pos = [false, a > 0, false];
start = strfind(pos, [false, true]);
stop = strfind(pos, [true, false]) -1;
run = stop - start + 1;
b = zeros(size(a));
b(start) = run;
b(stop+1) = -run;
if length(b) == length(a)
a = cumsum(b);
else
a = cumsum(b(1:length(b) - 1));
end

Kategorien

Mehr zu Loops and Conditional Statements finden Sie in Hilfe-Center und File Exchange

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by