can this 'for loop' be replaced? thanks in advance
counts=[];
for i=1 : length(b)-1
c=length(tof( tof >= b(i) & tof < b(i+1)) ) ;
counts=[counts,c];
end

 Akzeptierte Antwort

Jan
Jan am 7 Nov. 2019
Bearbeitet: Jan am 7 Nov. 2019

0 Stimmen

A ,ore efficient version of the loop:
nb = numel(b) - 1;
counts = zeros(1, nb); % Pre-allocation!!!
for i = 1:nb
counts(i) = sum(tof >= b(i) & tof < b(i+1));
end
Is tof a scalar or a vector? Is b sorted? Are you looking for histcounts ?
Pre-allocation is essential, because letting an array grow iteratively is extremely expensive.

2 Kommentare

sb
sb am 7 Nov. 2019
this loop works well and is 1.5 times faster. tof is a scaler, b is sorted, I am looking at histcouts without matlab's inbuilt code.
Image Analyst
Image Analyst am 7 Nov. 2019
Not sure what that means exactly, but if you need more help, attach your data and the desired/expected output.

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Weitere Antworten (1)

Image Analyst
Image Analyst am 7 Nov. 2019

0 Stimmen

Try this (untested)
lastIndex = length(b)-1;
indexes = (tof > b(1:lastIndex)) & (tof < b(2:lastIndex + 1));
counts = cumsum(indexes)

Kategorien

Mehr zu Loops and Conditional Statements finden Sie in Hilfe-Center und File Exchange

Tags

Gefragt:

sb
am 7 Nov. 2019

Kommentiert:

am 7 Nov. 2019

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by