Ergebnisse für
Hi Everyone!
As this is the most difficult question in problem group "Cody Contest 2025". To solve this problem, It is very important to understand all the hidden clues in the problem statement. Because everything is not directly visible.
For those who tried the problem, but were not able to solve. You might have missed any of the below hints -
- “The other players do not get to see which card has been shown, but they do know which three cards were asked for and that the player asked had one of them.” - Even when the card identity isn’t revealed (result = 0), you still gain partial knowledge — the asked player must have at least one of those three cards, meaning you can mark other players as not having all three simultaneously.
- "If it is your turn, you know the exact identity of that card" - You only know the exact shown card when result = 1, 2, or 3 — and it must be your turn. If someone else asked (even if you know result = 0), you don’t know which one was shown. So the meaning of result depends on whose turn it was, which is implicit — MATLAB code must assume that turns alternate 1→m→1, so your turn index is determined by (t-1) mod m + 1 == pnum.
- "Any leftover cards are placed face-up so that all players can see them" - These cards (commoncards) are not in anyone’s hand and cannot be in the envelope. So they’re not just visible — they’re logical constraints to eliminate from deduction.
- “It may be possible to determine the solution from less information than is given, but the information given will always be sufficient.”
- "Turn order is implied, not given explicitly" - Players take turns in order (1 to m, and back to 1).
On considering all the clues and constraints in the question, you will definitely be able to card for each category present in envelope.
I hope above clues will be useful for you.
Thank you, wishing you the success!
Regards,
Dev
Experimenting with Agentic AI
44%
I am an AI skeptic
0%
AI is banned at work
11%
I am happy with Conversational AI
44%
9 Stimmen
When solving Cody problems, sometimes your solution takes too long — especially if you’re recomputing large arrays or iterative sequences every time your function is called.
The Cody work area resets between separate runs of your code, but within one Cody test suite, your function may be called multiple times in a single session.
This is where persistent variables come in handy.
A persistent variable keeps its value between function calls, but only while MATLAB is still running your function suite.
This means:
- You can cache results to avoid recomputation.
- You can accumulate data across multiple calls.
- But it resets when Cody or MATLAB restarts.
Suppose you’re asked to find the n-th Fibonacci number efficiently — Cody may time out if you use recursion naively. Here’s how to use persistent to store computed values:
function f = fibPersistent(n)
import java.math.BigInteger
persistent F
if isempty(F)
F=[BigInteger('0'),BigInteger('1')];
for k=3:10000
F(k)=F(k-1).add(F(k-2));
end
end
% Extend the stored sequence only if needed
while length(F) <= n
F(end+1)=F(end).add(F(end-1));
end
f = char(F(n+1).toString); % since F(1) is really F(0)
end
%calling function 100 times
K=arrayfun(@(x)fibPersistent(x),randi(10000,1,100),'UniformOutput',false);
K(100)
The fzero function can handle extremely messy equations — even those mixing exponentials, trigonometric, and logarithmic terms — provided the function is continuous near the root and you give a reasonable starting point or interval.
It’s ideal for cases like:
- Solving energy balance equations
- Finding intersection points of nonlinear models
- Determining parameters from experimental data
Example: Solving for Equilibrium Temperature in a Heat Radiation-Conduction Model
Suppose a spacecraft component exchanges heat via conduction and radiation with its environment. At steady state, the power generated internally equals the heat lost:
Given constants:
= 25 W- k = 0.5 W/K
- ϵ = 0.8
- σ = 5.67e−8 W/m²K⁴
- A = 0.1 m²
= 250 K
Find the steady-state temperature, T.
% Given constants
Qgen = 25;
k = 0.5;
eps = 0.8;
sigma = 5.67e-8;
A = 0.1;
Tinf = 250;
% Define the energy balance equation (set equal to zero)
f = @(T) Qgen - (k*(T - Tinf) + eps*sigma*A*(T.^4 - Tinf^4));
% Plot for a sense of where the root lies before implementing
fplot(f, [250 300]); grid on
xlabel('Temperature (K)'); ylabel('f(T)')
title('Energy Balance: Root corresponds to steady-state temperature')
% Use fzero with an interval that brackets the root
T_eq = fzero(f, [250 300]);
fprintf('Steady-state temperature: %.2f K\n', T_eq);
It’s exciting to dive into a new dataset full of unfamiliar variables but it can also be overwhelming if you’re not sure where to start. Recently, I discovered some new interactive features in MATLAB live scripts that make it much easier to get an overview of your data. With just a few clicks, you can display sparklines and summary statistics using table variables, sort and filter variables, and even have MATLAB generate the corresponding code for reproducibility.
The Graphics and App Building blog published an article that walks through these features showing how to explore, clean, and analyze data—all without writing any code.
If you’re interested in streamlining your exploratory data analysis or want to see what’s new in live scripts, you might find it helpful:
If you’ve tried these features or have your own tips for quick data exploration in MATLAB, I’d love to hear your thoughts!
I set my 3D matrix up with the players in the 3rd dimension. I set up the matrix with: 1) player does not hold the card (-1), player holds the card (1), and unknown holding the card (0). I moved through the turns (-1 and 1) that are fixed first. Then cycled through the conditional turns (0) while checking the cards of each player using the hints provided until it was solved. The key for me in solving several of the tests (11, 17, and 19) was looking at the 1's and 0's being held by each player.
sum(cardState==1,3);%any zeros in this 2D matrix indicate possible cards in the solution
sum(cardState==0,3)>0;%the ones in this 2D matrix indicate the only unknown positions
sum(cardState==1,3)|sum(cardState==0,3)>0;%oring the two together could provide valuable information
Some MATLAB Cody problems prohibit loops (for, while) or conditionals (if, switch, while), forcing creative solutions.
One elegant trick is to use nested functions and recursion to achieve the same logic — while staying within the rules.
Example: Recursive Summation Without Loops or Conditionals
Suppose loops and conditionals are banned, but you need to compute the sum of numbers from 1 to n. This is a simple example and obvisously n*(n+1)/2 would be preferred.
function s = sumRecursive(n)
zero=@(x)0;
s = helper(n); % call nested recursive function
function out = helper(k)
L={zero,@helper};
out = k+L{(k>0)+1}(k-1);
end
end
sumRecursive(10)
- The helper function calls itself until the base case is reached.
- Logical indexing into a cell array (k>0) act as an 'if' replacement.
- MATLAB allows nested functions to share variables and functions (zero), so you can keep state across calls.
Tips:
- Replace 'if' with logical indexing into a cell array.
- Replace for/while with recursion.
- Nested functions are local and can access outer variables, avoiding global state.
Many MATLAB Cody problems involve recognizing integer sequences.
If a sequence looks familiar but you can’t quite place it, the On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences (OEIS) can be your best friend.
OEIS will often identify the sequence, provide a formula, recurrence relation, or even direct MATLAB-compatible pseudocode.
Example: Recognizing a Cody Sequence
Suppose you encounter this sequence in a Cody problem:
1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21, ...
Entering it on OEIS yields A000045 – The Fibonacci Numbers, defined by:
F(n) = F(n-1) + F(n-2), with F(1)=1, F(2)=1
You can then directly implement it in MATLAB:
function F = fibSeq(n)
F = zeros(1,n);
F(1:2) = 1;
for k = 3:n
F(k) = F(k-1) + F(k-2);
end
end
fibSeq(15)
When solving MATLAB Cody problems involving very large integers (e.g., factorials, Fibonacci numbers, or modular arithmetic), you might exceed MATLAB’s built-in numeric limits.
To overcome this, you can use Java’s java.math.BigInteger directly within MATLAB — it’s fast, exact, and often accepted by Cody if you convert the final result to a numeric or string form.
Below is an example of using it to find large factorials.
function s = bigFactorial(n)
import java.math.BigInteger
f = BigInteger('1');
for k = 2:n
f = f.multiply(BigInteger(num2str(k)));
end
s = char(f.toString); % Return as string to avoid overflow
end
bigFactorial(100)
If you have solved a Cody problem before, you have likely seen the Scratch Pad text field below the Solution text field. It provides a quick way to get feedback on your solution before submitting it. Since submitting a solution takes you to a new page, any time a wrong solution is submitted, you have to navigate back to the problem page to try it again.
Instead, I use the Scratch Pad to test my solution repeatedly before submitting. That way, I get to a working solution faster without having to potentially go back and forth many times between the problem page and the wrong-solution page.
Here is my approach:
- Write a tentative solution.
- Copy a test case from the test suite into the Scratch Pad.
- Click the Run Function button—this is immediately below the Scratch Pad and above the Output panel and Submit buttons.
- If the solution does not work, modify the solution code, sometimes putting in disp() lines and/or removing semicolons to trace what the code is doing. Repeat until the solution passes.
- If the solution does work, repeat steps 2 through 4.
- Once there are no more test cases to copy and paste, clean up the code, if necessary (delete disp lines, reinstate all semicolons to suppress output). Click the Run Function button once more, just to make sure I did not break the solution while cleaning it up. Then, click the Submit button.
For problems with large test suites, you may find it useful to copy and paste in multiple test cases per iteration.
Hopefully you find this useful.
Run MATLAB using AI applications by leveraging MCP. This MCP server for MATLAB supports a wide range of coding agents like Claude Code and Visual Studio Code.
Check it out and share your experiences below. Have fun!
GitHub repo: https://github.com/matlab/matlab-mcp-core-server
Yann Debray's blog post: https://blogs.mathworks.com/deep-learning/2025/11/03/releasing-the-matlab-mcp-core-server-on-github/
Hey Relentless Coders! 😎
Let’s get to know each other. Drop a quick intro below and meet your teammates! This is your chance to meet teammates, find coding buddies, and build connections that make the contest more fun and rewarding!
You can share:
- Your name or nickname
- Where you’re from
- Your favorite coding topic or language
- What you’re most excited about in the contest
Let’s make Team Relentless Coders an awesome community—jump in and say hi! 🚀
Welcome to the Cody Contest 2025 and the Relentless Coders team channel! 🎉
You never give up. When a problem gets tough, you dig in deeper. This is your space to connect with like-minded coders, share insights, and help your team win. To make sure everyone has a great experience, please keep these tips in mind:
- Follow the Community Guidelines: Take a moment to review our community standards. Posts that don’t follow these guidelines may be flagged by moderators or community members.
- Ask Questions About Cody Problems: When asking for help, show your work! Include your code, error messages, and any details needed to reproduce your results. This helps others provide useful, targeted answers.
- Share Tips & Tricks: Knowledge sharing is key to success. When posting tips or solutions, explain how and why your approach works so others can learn your problem-solving methods.
- Provide Feedback: We value your feedback! Use this channel to report issues or share creative ideas to make the contest even better.
Have fun and enjoy the challenge! We hope you’ll learn new MATLAB skills, make great connections, and win amazing prizes! 🚀
The all-community-solutions view shows the ID of each solution, and you can click on the link to go to the solution.
The preferred-community-solutions view does not show the solution IDs and does not link to the solutions. As far as I can tell, there is no way to get from that view to the solutions. If, for example, you want to go to the solution to leave a comment there, you can't.
All-community-solutions view:
Preferred-community-solutions view, with no solution IDs and no links:
Hi cody fellows,
I already solved more than 500 problems -months ago, last july if I remember well- and get this scholar badge, but then it suddenly disappeared a few weeks later. I then solved a few more problems and it reappeared.
Now I observed it disappeared once more a few days ago.
Have you also noticed this erratic behavior of the scholar badge ? Is it normal and / or intentional ? If not, how to explain it ? (deleted problems ?)
Cheers,
Nicolas
I'm seeing solution maps shown with low-contrast gray colors instead of the correct symbol colors. I have observed this using both Safari and Chrome. Screenshot:
Here is a screenshot of a Cody problem that I just created. The math rendering is poor. (I have since edited the problem to remove the math formatting.)
I just learned you can access MATLAB Online from the following shortcut in your web browser: https://matlab.new
Thanks @Yann Debray
From his recent blog post: pip & uv in MATLAB Online » Artificial Intelligence - MATLAB & Simulink
Are there any code restrictions for programming Cody solutions? I could not find anything mentioned at https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/content/cody/about.html, other than toolbox functions not being available.
What if you had no isprime utility to rely on in MATLAB? How would you identify a number as prime? An easy answer might be something tricky, like that in simpleIsPrime0.
simpleIsPrime0 = @(N) ismember(N,primes(N));
But I’ll also disallow the use of primes here, as it does not really test to see if a number is prime. As well, it would seem horribly inefficient, generating a possibly huge list of primes, merely to learn something about the last member of the list.
Looking for a more serious test for primality, I’ve already shown how to lighten the load by a bit using roughness, to sometimes identify numbers as composite and therefore not prime.
https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/discussions/tips/879745-primes-and-rough-numbers-basic-ideas
But to actually learn if some number is prime, we must do a little more. Yes, this is a common homework problem assigned to students, something we have seen many times on Answers. It can be approached in many ways too, so it is worth looking at the problem in some depth.
The definition of a prime number is a natural number greater than 1, which has only two factors, thus 1 and itself. That makes a simple test for primality of the number N easy. We just try dividing the number by every integer greater than 1, and not exceeding N-1. If any of those trial divides leaves a zero remainder, then N cannot be prime. And of course we can use mod or rem instead of an explicit divide, so we need not worry about floating point trash, as long as the numbers being tested are not too large.
simpleIsPrime1 = @(N) all(mod(N,2:N-1) ~= 0);
Of course, simpleIsPrime1 is not a good code, in the sense that it fails to check if N is an integer, or if N is less than or equal to 1. It is not vectorized, and it has no documentation at all. But it does the job well enough for one simple line of code. There is some virtue in simplicity after all, and it is certainly easy to read. But sometimes, I wish a function handle could include some help comments too! A feature request might be in the offing.
simpleIsPrime1(9931)
simpleIsPrime1(9932)
simpleIsPrime1 works quite nicely, and seems pretty fast. What could be wrong? At some point, the student is given a more difficult problem, to identify if a significantly larger integer is prime. simpleIsPrime1 will then cause a computer to grind to a distressing halt if given a sufficiently large number to test. Or it might even error out, when too large a vector of numbers was generated to test against. For example, I don't think you want to test a number of the order of 2^64 using simpleIsPrime1, as performing on the order of 2^64 divides will be highly time consuming.
uint64(2)^63-25
Is it prime? I’ve not tested it to learn if it is, and simpleIsPrime1 is not the tool to perform that test anyway.
A student might realize the largest possible integer factors of some number N are the numbers N/2 and N itself. But, if N/2 is a factor, then so is 2, and some thought would suggest it is sufficient to test only for factors that do not exceed sqrt(N). This is because if a is a divisor of N, then so is b=N/a. If one of them is larger than sqrt(N), then the other must be smaller. That could lead us to an improved scheme in simpleIsPrime2.
simpleIsPrime2 = @(N) all(mod(N,2:sqrt(N)));
For an integer of the size 2^64, now you only need to perform roughly 2^32 trial divides. Maybe we might consider the subtle improvement found in simpleIsPrime3, which avoids trial divides by the even integers greater than 2.
simpleIsPrime3 = @(N) (N == 2) || (mod(N,2) && all(mod(N,3:2:sqrt(N))));
simpleIsPrime3 needs only an approximate maximum of 2^31 trial divides even for numbers as large as uint64 can represent. While that is large, it is still generally doable on the computers we have today, even if it might be slow.
Sadly, my goals are higher than even the rather lofty limit given by UINT64 numbers. The problem of course is that a trial divide scheme, despite being 100% accurate in its assessment of primality, is a time hog. Even an O(sqrt(N)) scheme is far too slow for numbers with thousands or millions of digits. And even for a number as “small” as 1e100, a direct set of trial divides by all primes less than sqrt(1e100) would still be practically impossible, as there are roughly n/log(n) primes that do not exceed n. For an integer on the order of 1e50,
1e50/log(1e50)
It is practically impossible to perform that many divides on any computer we can make today. Can we do better? Is there some more efficient test for primality? For example, we could write a simple sieve of Eratosthenes to check each prime found not exceeding sqrt(N).
function [TF,SmallPrime] = simpleIsPrime4(N)
% simpleIsPrime3 - Sieve of Eratosthenes to identify if N is prime
% [TF,SmallPrime] = simpleIsPrime3(N)
%
% Returns true if N is prime, as well as the smallest prime factor
% of N when N is composite. If N is prime, then SmallPrime will be N.
Nroot = ceil(sqrt(N)); % ceil caters for floating point issues with the sqrt
TF = true;
SieveList = true(1,Nroot+1); SieveList(1) = false;
SmallPrime = 2;
while TF
% Find the "next" true element in SieveList
while (SmallPrime <= Nroot+1) && ~SieveList(SmallPrime)
SmallPrime = SmallPrime + 1;
end
% When we drop out of this loop, we have found the next
% small prime to check to see if it divides N, OR, we
% have gone past sqrt(N)
if SmallPrime > Nroot
% this is the case where we have now looked at all
% primes not exceeding sqrt(N), and have found none
% that divide N. This is where we will drop out to
% identify N as prime. TF is already true, so we need
% not set TF.
SmallPrime = N;
return
else
if mod(N,SmallPrime) == 0
% smallPrime does divide N, so we are done
TF = false;
return
end
% update SieveList
SieveList(SmallPrime:SmallPrime:Nroot) = false;
end
end
end
simpleIsPrime4 does indeed work reasonably well, though it is sometimes a little slower than is simpleIsPrime3, and everything is hugely faster than simpleIsPrime1.
timeit(@() simpleIsPrime1(111111111))
timeit(@() simpleIsPrime2(111111111))
timeit(@() simpleIsPrime3(111111111))
timeit(@() simpleIsPrime4(111111111))
All of those times will slow to a crawl for much larger numbers of course. And while I might find a way to subtly improve upon these codes, any improvement will be marginal in the end if I try to use any such direct approach to primality. We must look in a different direction completely to find serious gains.
At this point, I want to distinguish between two distinct classes of tests for primality of some large number. One class of test is what I might call an absolute or infallible test, one that is perfectly reliable. These are tests where if X is identified as prime/composite then we can trust the result absolutely. The tests I showed in the form of simpleIsPrime1, simpleIsPrime2, simpleIsPrime3 and aimpleIsprime4, were all 100% accurate, thus they fall into the class of infallible tests.
The second general class of test for primality is what I will call an evidentiary test. Such a test provides evidence, possibly quite strong evidence, that the given number is prime, but in some cases, it might be mistaken. I've already offered a basic example of a weak evidentiary test for primality in the form of roughness. All primes are maximally rough. And therefore, if you can identify X as being rough to some extent, this provides evidence that X is also prime, and the depth of the roughness test influences the strength of the evidence for primality. While this is generally a fairly weak test, it is a test nevertheless, and a good exclusionary test, a good way to avoid more sophisticated but time consuming tests.
These evidentiary tests all have the property that if they do identify X as being composite, then they are always correct. In the context of roughness, if X is not sufficiently rough, then X is also not prime. On the other side of the coin, if you can show X is at least (sqrt(X)+1)-rough, then it is positively prime. (I say this to suggest that some evidentiary tests for primality can be turned into truth telling tests, but that may take more effort than you can afford.) The problem is of course that is literally impossible to verify that degree of roughness for numbers with many thousands of digits.
In my next post, I'll look at the Fermat test for primality, based on Fermat's little theorem.
