why setdiff have time longer than for ?
7 Ansichten (letzte 30 Tage)
Ältere Kommentare anzeigen
*hi,
Itried to make my code be faster , so i used setdiff instead of a part in my code
I used:*
v=(1:18);
buf=setdiff(v,unique_x);
relevant_item(ttt(i),1:length(buf))=buf;
*instead of *
for v=1:18
b2=find(unique_x==v);
if isempty(b2)
relevant_item(ttt(i),h)=v;
h=h+1;
end
end
*why the running time of this part is less than of setdiff?
thanks*
0 Kommentare
Akzeptierte Antwort
Walter Roberson
am 12 Mai 2013
setdiff() essentially has to sort each time -- or at least to check if the set is ordered.
Are the unique_x restricted to being in the allowed range for v, 1:18 ? If so, then how about
buf = 1:10;
buf(unique_x) = [];
relevant_item(ttt(i),1:length(buf))=buf;
3 Kommentare
Jan
am 15 Mai 2013
@huda: Look into the code of setdiff. You find the relevant part in the fast MEX function ismembc2, which expects pre-sorted data. So sort your data explicitly, call this function and use the replied indices. Note that ismembc2 is not documented, but you find enough information about it in the net.
Weitere Antworten (0)
Siehe auch
Kategorien
Mehr zu Matrices and Arrays finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!