array operations consuming lower time

1 Ansicht (letzte 30 Tage)
Sara
Sara am 29 Aug. 2012
Hi, we have an array x, I would like to do such a operation on it. It can be possible to implement it another way that consumes lower time?
y1y2 = x(2:n+2)+x(1:n+1) ;
Or is there any function to sum the two adjacent element of arrays? E.g., we want to add x(i) to x (i+1), for i=1 to n. and create the result as an array by the size of n-1. It means the i th element of new array is x(i)+x(i+1) .
Thanks in advance

Antworten (2)

Daniel Shub
Daniel Shub am 29 Aug. 2012
Bearbeitet: Daniel Shub am 29 Aug. 2012
On my computer I can do a little better with conv...
>> x = randn(1e7, 1);
>> tic, y1y2 = x(2:end)+x(1:(end-1)); toc
Elapsed time is 0.330432 seconds.
>> tic, z1z2 = conv(x, [1,1], 'valid'); toc
Elapsed time is 0.166114 seconds.
>> isequal(y1y2, z1z2)
ans =
1
  1 Kommentar
Jan
Jan am 30 Aug. 2012
Under Matlab 2009a both methods have the same speed. (Win7/64, DualCore)

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.


Jan
Jan am 29 Aug. 2012
Bearbeitet: Jan am 30 Aug. 2012
I'm curious about a speed comparison:
[EDITED, bugs fixed]
#include "mex.h"
void mexFunction(int nlhs, mxArray *plhs[], int nrhs, const mxArray *prhs[]) {
double *X, *Y, *XEnd, xi;
mwSize nX;
nX = mxGetNumberOfElements(prhs[0]);
X = mxGetPr(prhs[0]);
XEnd = X + nX;
plhs[0] = mxCreateDoubleMatrix(1, nX - 1, mxREAL);
Y = mxGetPr(plhs[0]);
xi = *X++;
while(X < XEnd) {
*Y++ = xi + *X;
xi = *X++;
}
return;
}
[EDITED, add timings]:
Matlab 2009a/64, Win7, Core2Duo:
tic, y1 = x(2:end)+x(1:(end-1)); toc
tic, y2 = conv(x, [1,1], 'valid'); toc
tic, y3 = addPairsMex(x); toc
isequal(y1, y2, y3)
Elapsed time is 0.276241 seconds.
Elapsed time is 0.265500 seconds.
Elapsed time is 0.095482 seconds.
1

Kategorien

Mehr zu Performance and Memory finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by