Filter löschen
Filter löschen

accelerating code in matlab - for loop

1 Ansicht (letzte 30 Tage)
Sara
Sara am 5 Jul. 2012
Hi Guys,
int = zeros(1,length(x));
if k <= 0
int = x ;
return
end
for n = 3:length(x)
y1 = x(2:n) ;
t1 = ((n-2):-1:0)*dt ;
y2 = x(1:n-1) ;
t2 = t1 +dt;
int(n) = sum (t1.^(k-1)/factorial(k-1).*y1 + t2.^(k-1)/factorial(k-1).*y2)*dt/2 ;
end
is there any suggestion to write this part of code more optimal? It is used for computing Integration. The most time consuming line is int(n)= ... Whether I can change and remove the for loop here, and implement the for functionality in another way, e.g. vectors? Any suggestions would be appreciated ...
  2 Kommentare
Ryan
Ryan am 5 Jul. 2012
for n = 3:length(x )
y1 = x(2:n) ;
t1 = ((n-2):-1:0)*dt ;
y2 = x(1:n-1) ;
t2 = t1 +dt;
int(n) = sum (t1.^(k-1)/factorial(k-1).*y1 + t2.^(k-1)/factorial(k-...
1).*y2)*dt/2 ;
end
Jan
Jan am 11 Jul. 2012
@Sara: You can delete your question using the "Delete" button left beside the question. If such a button does not appear although you are logged in, please contact an editor or files@mathworks.com and ask for deleteing the thread. Duplicate posts waste the time of the ones, who want to help you.

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Akzeptierte Antwort

Jan
Jan am 11 Jul. 2012
At first I've clean up your code a bit:
if k <= 0
int = x ;
return
end
int = zeros(1, length(x));
fk1 = factorial(k - 1);
dt2 = dt / 2;
for n = 3:length(x)
y1 = x(2:n);
t1 = ((n-2):-1:0) * dt;
y2 = x(1:n-1);
t2 = t1 + dt;
int(n) = sum(t1 .^ (k-1) / fk1 .* y1 + t2 .^ (k-1) / fk1 .* y2) * dt2;
end
Now some improvements:
lenx = length(x);
fk1 = factorial(k - 1);
t1Vec = (((lenx - 2):-1:0) * dt) .^ (k-1) * dt / fk1;
int = zeros(1, lenx);
dt2 = dt / 2;
for n = 3:lenx
y1 = x(2:n);
t1 = t1vec(lenx-a-n:lenx-b); % **see comment**
y2 = x(1:n-1);
t2 = t1 + dt;
int(n) = sum(t1 .* y1 + t2 .^ (k-1) / fk1 .* y2) * dt2;
end
I do not have the time to find the right constantd for a and b. Without access to Matlab I cannot simply try it, but you can. The idea is to avoid the repeated expensive calculation of t1 .^(k-1), when all elements except for one have been processed already. The same works for t2. I leave it up to you to elaborate this.
  3 Kommentare
Sara
Sara am 11 Jul. 2012
t1Vec = (((lenx - 2):-1:0) * dt) .^ (k-1) * dt / fk1;
the second dt is required where .. (k-1)times dt...
Jan
Jan am 11 Jul. 2012
I assume this is correct, Sara. "a" and "b" are used only to replicate the limits of t1 = ((n-2):-1:0) * dt.

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Weitere Antworten (1)

Matt Kindig
Matt Kindig am 5 Jul. 2012
Could you please format your code properly? It is difficult to tell which lines are commented, etc. Please edit your question to include proper line breaks, and then apply the 'code' tag (see the {} Code icon in the editor window).
Also, as a first observation, you should pre-allocate your variable 'int'--that is the reason that it is taking so long. Prior to the loop, add this line:
int = NaN(length(x), 1);
I think that this change alone will substantially improve your performance.
  2 Kommentare
Jan
Jan am 11 Jul. 2012
int is pre-allocated by zeros already.
Matt Kindig
Matt Kindig am 12 Jul. 2012
Ah yes, I think I missed that before.

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by