Answers has a nicer GUI and allows to format code, links and embed pictures. You can edit your questions and answers, such that typos and clarifications can be removed / inserted directly to support a fluent reading. There is no delay between the posting and the appering of a message and therefore the communications feels more direct.
Actually you can post questions in both forums. The total sum of the knowhow of the people answering in CSSM seems to be larger than in Answers. But we are working hard to improve this. E.g. Bruno has participated in the Answers forum, but he lost the interest for reasons, I can reconsider.
The amount of spam and inpoliteness is negligible here, because the admins and editors remove improper messages. I like it not to be insulted, see e.g. http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/newsreader/view_thread/261279.
While the CSSM forum has a static charm caused by the anachronistic interface, the more fancy interface of Answers has a great potential for further improvements. E.g. I get a keyboard latency of 0.3 seconds, such that editing is tedious.
Both forums suffer from nearly the same problem: Too many users do not care about the quality of their questions. Currently questions for clarifications and suggestions of a proper code formatting dominate my work here. Unfortunately I post:
Please add the complete error message instead of just "it does not work"
much more frequently than real solutions.
Searching for a existing solutions of a specific topic is not trivial in the Answers forum. It seems like Google is the better choice for such investigations.
