Count number of specific values in matrix

I have a large matrix, m, and am trying to count the number of a specific value (i.e. How many indexes are of the value 4?)
I tried using
val = sum(m == 4);
but I end up with val being a matrix/vector of numbers. I assume these numbers are from each column and should be added together for the total, so I tried another
num = sum(val == 4);
but then I just end up with another vector/matrix.
How can I do it?

2 Kommentare

Dev
Dev am 18 Okt. 2023
What if the value is zero?, how do I count then?
num = sum(val == 0, 'all'); %r2018b or later
num = sum(val(:) == 0); %any version
num = nnz(~val); %any version

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

 Akzeptierte Antwort

Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson am 2 Mai 2012

37 Stimmen

sum(m(:) == 4)

3 Kommentare

Romy Wolstencroft
Romy Wolstencroft am 22 Aug. 2019
This worked perfectly for me. Thank you
An alternative syntax available in R2018b or later is sum(m==4,'all'). But for this simple problem colonizing the input with m(:) is likely to be faster.
Andrew Frane
Andrew Frane am 22 Okt. 2024
Using the colon probably won't be faster to execute. If you use m(:) then Matlab has to do the additional step of creating a new array m(:) before doing the logical evaluation. In my tests, using 'all' is consistently faster than using the colon to vectorize the array.

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Weitere Antworten (6)

Kye Taylor
Kye Taylor am 2 Mai 2012

18 Stimmen

Try this:
numberOfNonZeros = nnz(m==4);
Using nnz is more efficient than converting logicals to numeric, which is required to apply sum()

2 Kommentare

Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson am 22 Aug. 2019
Bearbeitet: Walter Roberson am 22 Aug. 2019
In the test I just did, the timings of sum() vs nnz() could not consistently tell the two cases apart. nnz() might possibly have been slightly faster, but the range of timings showed so much overlap that no real conclusion could be reached. It would make sense that nnz() could be faster, but I can't prove it at the moment. sum() on a large enough array could be dispatched to LAPACK after all.
Andrew Frane
Andrew Frane am 22 Okt. 2024
I did a million iterations after defining m as a 1x1000000 vector, and nnz(m==4) beat sum(m==4) every time.
I did another million iterations after defining m as a 1000x1000 matrix, and nnz(m(:)==4) beat both sum(m(:)==4) and sum(m==4, 'all') every time.
So nnz does appear to be more efficient than sum.

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Sean de Wolski
Sean de Wolski am 2 Mai 2012

9 Stimmen

This could be done easily with histc() and unique() to get the number of each value:
uv = unique(x);
n = histc(x,uv);
Or with unique() and accumarray():
[uv,~,idx] = unique(x);
n = accumarray(idx(:),1)

2 Kommentare

Royi Avital
Royi Avital am 10 Okt. 2022
Pay attention that histcount() won't have the same result as histc() above for this case (Difference at the end).
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson am 11 Okt. 2022
Royi is correct.
At the time the question was asked, histcounts did not exist.
The newer histcounts is recommended instead of histc()
In the where you pass in the bin edges, then histc() counts values that exactly match the upper limit separately, but histcounts counts them together with the previous bin.

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

ntsh kr
ntsh kr am 12 Okt. 2017
Bearbeitet: ntsh kr am 12 Okt. 2017

5 Stimmen

>> a
a =
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 9 96
5 3 9 5 2 7 5 6 2 1
8 3 6 9 8 7 5 1 6 9
>> ans1=sum(a==5)
ans1 =
2 1 1 2 1 1 3 0 0 0
>> b=sum(ans1)
b =
11
dipanka tanu sarmah
dipanka tanu sarmah am 11 Nov. 2017

1 Stimme

along with this if you want to count the number of NaN ,(if there any) use nnz(isnan(m))
vimal kumar chawda
vimal kumar chawda am 18 Mai 2020

0 Stimmen

But if we want ot do for NaN and any numeric value in large matrix then ?
ans1=sum(a==5) so at this my value is numerical (which is not same all time) and other is NaN which is common. But i need to count only numerical value at particular value of x.,x2,x3...............x7000 which is on y axis.
-How many times y appear on the at particular value of x?
Patrick Benz
Patrick Benz am 2 Apr. 2021

0 Stimmen

How can I count the values in the second column of an array depending on the values in the column?
I've got an array that looks something like that:
400 0
396 0
392 1
400 0
396 1
400 1
and I want to know how often there is a "1" or a "0" next to a "400" or next to the other values.
but this only gives me the total numbers of "1" and "0" and how often there is a 392 in the first column.

4 Kommentare

Image Analyst
Image Analyst am 2 Apr. 2021
This doesn't look like an answer to @Corey Bullard so I think you should start your own question.
Corey Bullard
Corey Bullard am 2 Apr. 2021
Another year, another answer to this decade old question.

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Kategorien

Mehr zu Matrices and Arrays finden Sie in Hilfe-Center und File Exchange

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by