OSX and Mac Performance

1 Ansicht (letzte 30 Tage)
CustomBuilt
CustomBuilt am 18 Okt. 2016
Kommentiert: John D'Errico am 22 Jun. 2017
I have two apple computers and thought it would be an interesting to compare performance (computer spec below)
COMPUTER A
  • Model Name: Mac Pro
  • Model Identifier: MacPro6,1
  • Processor Name: 6-Core Intel Xeon E5
  • Processor Speed: 3.5 GHz
  • Number of Processors: 1
  • Total Number of Cores:6
  • L2 Cache (per Core): 256 KB
  • L3 Cache: 12 MB
  • Memory: 64 GB
COMPUTER B
  • Model Name: MacBook Air
  • Model Identifier: MacBookAir6,2
  • Processor Name: Intel Core i7
  • Processor Speed: 1.7 GHz
  • Number of Processors: 1
  • Total Number of Cores:2
  • L2 Cache (per Core): 256 KB
  • L3 Cache: 4 MB
  • Memory: 8 GB
I use a simple fft() in a loop to test performance
function [ X ] = test( x )
a = 1:10000000;
for i = a
fft(x);
end
end
The performance is measured by timeit()
>> x = randn(8,1)
>> temp = @() test(x)
>> timeit(temp)
Computer A = 15.1 seconds Computer B = 11.1 seconds
The MacBook Air spanks the Mac Pro for performance
Why is this the case?
  1 Kommentar
Ken Atwell
Ken Atwell am 18 Okt. 2016
That is not much of an FFT. What if the vector is of a more realistic size, a say 1K or 2K?

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Antworten (1)

Nelson Mark
Nelson Mark am 22 Jun. 2017
This is interesting and caught my eye because I'm thinking of buying a Mac Pro. Would you be willing to run some additional benchmarks on some different types of computations? e.g., generate 10000 X 5 random matrices, then doing least squares of column 1 on columns 2-5, 1000 times.
  1 Kommentar
John D'Errico
John D'Errico am 22 Jun. 2017
This is not an answer. Please don't add answers just to make a comment, certainly not on a question that has seen no activity for nearly a year.

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Produkte

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by