Numerical issue in simple summation/addition
Ältere Kommentare anzeigen
below code prints 1. But if you have b = 0.2 at the second line, it does not print 1.
a = 0;
b = 0.1;
c = a;
while c < 1
c
c = c+b;
end
Akzeptierte Antwort
Weitere Antworten (2)
Image Analyst
am 23 Jan. 2016
1 Stimme
It has nothing to do with the version. It has everything to do with digitization/quantization differences as discussed in the FAQ: http://matlab.wikia.com/wiki/FAQ#Why_is_0.3_-_0.2_-_0.1_.28or_similar.29_not_equal_to_zero.3F
4 Kommentare
Star Strider
am 23 Jan. 2016
There is no fix, and even the most recent version of round (that my ‘roundn’ function emulates) will not produce an ‘exact’ decimal equivalent of a decimal fraction. Computers (most of them, at least) do everything in binary, and so have to express decimal fractions in binary approximations. (The only computer that I’m aware of that used decimal calculations was the IBM 1620 that I first learned FORTRAN on. The first several cards in a compiled deck loaded the lookup tables it used. IBM engineers called it the ‘CADET’ — Can’t Add, Doesn’t Even Try!)
roundn = @(x,n) round(x .* 10.^n)./10.^n; % Round ‘x’ To ‘n’ Digits, Emulates Latest ‘round’ Function
Run your code using format long E to see the reason b=0.1 is actually stopping before 1, just as you want it to:
format long E
a = 0;
b = 0.1;
c = a;
while c < 1
c
c = c+b;
end
Ali
am 23 Jan. 2016
Star Strider
am 23 Jan. 2016
My pleasure.
Image Analyst
am 23 Jan. 2016
"What's the fix?" Did you read the FAQ like both Star and I pointed you to? In there is the "fix" or way to deal with the reality of it -- you check against a tolerance.
Kategorien
Mehr zu Introduction to Installation and Licensing finden Sie in Hilfe-Center und File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!