Solve for variable x in a matrix with matlab
3 Ansichten (letzte 30 Tage)
Ältere Kommentare anzeigen
BuckeyeLink
am 5 Nov. 2015
Bearbeitet: Walter Roberson
am 6 Nov. 2015
I want to use matlab to solve for x in this matrix:
A= [ 1 x 1 0 0 0 ;
0 1 x 1 0 0 ;
0 0 1 x 1 1 ;
0 0 0 1 x 1 ;
1 0 0 0 1 x ]
2 Kommentare
John D'Errico
am 6 Nov. 2015
Sigh. solve for the determinant when the matrix is equal to zero? Again. no mathematical meaning in that comment.
You can have a determinant of a matrix, but not a non-square matrix.
You cannot have the determinant of an equality, so asking for the determinant when the matrix is equal to zero is meaningless in terms of mathematics.
Maybe you meant to solve for x, such that the determinant of A is zero. But that too is meaningless, since A is non-square.
Akzeptierte Antwort
Star Strider
am 5 Nov. 2015
It looks to me that any arbitrary value would work, if that’s all the information you have.
2 Kommentare
Star Strider
am 5 Nov. 2015
Bearbeitet: Star Strider
am 5 Nov. 2015
I had to look up ‘secular equation’. It seems it’s the characteristic polynomial of a square matrix (eigenvalues), but your matrix isn’t square.
I would put zeros in place of the ‘x’ values and use the eig function. See also Eigenvalues and Singlular Values for a comprehensive list of applicable functions.
EDIT — Consider using the Symbolic Math Toolbox.
Weitere Antworten (1)
John D'Errico
am 5 Nov. 2015
Bearbeitet: John D'Errico
am 6 Nov. 2015
Solve what? A variable is just that, an unknown number. A matrix is just a collection of numbers. You have posed no equality statement, so there is no solution to be found.
Had you given some relationship that involves A. For example, solve for x, such that A is singular, or that A has a minimum norm, or that norm(A*ones(5,1)) is minimized, or any of a variety of equality statements, then we could talk about a solution. The solution might not be unique.
But as your question is posed, it is a meaningless question. There is no "solution".
Edit:
I'll assume that the real question is to solve for x, SUCH THAT the determinant, det(A(x))==0
I'll also assume that A is a square matrix, so I am forced to arbitrarily modify A so that can happen.
syms x
A= [ 1 x 1 0 0 0 ;
0 1 x 1 0 0 ;
0 0 1 x 1 1 ;
0 0 0 1 x 1 ;
1 0 0 0 1 x ;
0 1 0 0 0 1];
A is now a square matrix.
p = det(A)
p =
2*x^4 - 6*x^2 + 4
solve(p == 0)
ans =
-1
1
2^(1 / 2)
-2^(1 / 2)
Finally, IF by secular equation, you intend to solve for the roots of the characteristic polynomial, in theory, this would be done as follows:
syms lambda
P = det(A - lambda*eye(6))
P =
lambda^6 - 6*lambda^5 + 15*lambda^4 - lambda^3*x - 22*lambda^3 - 6*lambda^2*x^2 + 3*lambda^2*x + 21*lambda^2 - 2*lambda*x^4 + 12*lambda*x^2 - 3*lambda*x - 12*lambda + 2*x^4 - 6*x^2 + 4
solve(P == 0,lambda)
ans =
root(z^6 - 6*z^5 + 15*z^4 - z^3*(x + 22) + z^2*(3*x - 6*x^2 + 21) - z*(3*x - 12*x^2 + 2*x^4 + 12) - 6*x^2 + 2*x^4 + 4, z, 1)
root(z^6 - 6*z^5 + 15*z^4 - z^3*(x + 22) + z^2*(3*x - 6*x^2 + 21) - z*(3*x - 12*x^2 + 2*x^4 + 12) - 6*x^2 + 2*x^4 + 4, z, 2)
root(z^6 - 6*z^5 + 15*z^4 - z^3*(x + 22) + z^2*(3*x - 6*x^2 + 21) - z*(3*x - 12*x^2 + 2*x^4 + 12) - 6*x^2 + 2*x^4 + 4, z, 3)
root(z^6 - 6*z^5 + 15*z^4 - z^3*(x + 22) + z^2*(3*x - 6*x^2 + 21) - z*(3*x - 12*x^2 + 2*x^4 + 12) - 6*x^2 + 2*x^4 + 4, z, 4)
root(z^6 - 6*z^5 + 15*z^4 - z^3*(x + 22) + z^2*(3*x - 6*x^2 + 21) - z*(3*x - 12*x^2 + 2*x^4 + 12) - 6*x^2 + 2*x^4 + 4, z, 5)
root(z^6 - 6*z^5 + 15*z^4 - z^3*(x + 22) + z^2*(3*x - 6*x^2 + 21) - z*(3*x - 12*x^2 + 2*x^4 + 12) - 6*x^2 + 2*x^4 + 4, z, 6)
Of course, it must fail, since this is a polynomial of order higher than 4, with non-constant coefficients. So we cannot solve it.
You need to explain your problem CLEARLY.
2 Kommentare
John D'Errico
am 6 Nov. 2015
Still meaningless. The matrix is not square. eigenvalues are undefined for non-square matrices.
Siehe auch
Kategorien
Mehr zu Linear Algebra finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!