Simulink: Mask parameter fails to bind to block port
2 Ansichten (letzte 30 Tage)
Ältere Kommentare anzeigen
Lucas Ritzdorf
am 15 Apr. 2024
Kommentiert: Lucas Ritzdorf
am 17 Apr. 2024
I'm currently working with a MATLAB Function block inside of Simulink, and I'd like to expose one of the function's arguments as a parameter in the Simulink UI. A mask seems to be the usual way of doing this, but upon adding a mask, it doesn't "bind" to the underlying block's port, as I would have expected.
Is this normal? If not, how might I go about troubleshooting this? If so, how can I prevent later users from connecting normal Simulink signals to the exposed port?
For reference, here are my mask parameters, as well as the underlying block (with the masked port exposed):
2 Kommentare
Fangjun Jiang
am 15 Apr. 2024
I am not following. "expose one of the function's arguments", what argument? what do you mean by "expose"?
Akzeptierte Antwort
Fangjun Jiang
am 16 Apr. 2024
- It is more involved for this task. I hope the attached model (in R2022b) make it easier.
- In your model, the two inports are called input arguments, the two outports are called output arguments.
- You need to make "num_outputs" as a "parameter data", not "input data".
- You need to make "output" variable size and specify the max value as 24.
- Make a mask and pass down the value for "num_outputs"
- Run simulation and you will see 5 elements are non-zoro. Double click the masked MATLAB Function block, change the value from 5 to 3 to see the output display.
Weitere Antworten (0)
Siehe auch
Kategorien
Mehr zu Author Block Masks finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!