Hello, is there a simpler way to produce this result without 'for loop' ?
Thanks a lot.
A{1,1} = [0 1] ;
A{2,1} = 2 ;
A{3,1} = [3 4 5 ];
disp(A)
{[ 0 1]} {[ 2]} {[3 4 5]}
B{1,1} = 10 ;
B{2,1} = [ ];
B{3,1} = [ 10 11 12];
disp(B)
{[ 10]} {0×0 double} {[10 11 12]}
out = horzcatcellmat(A,B);
disp(out)
{[ 0 1 10]} {[ 2]} {[3 4 5 10 11 12]}
C = {[ 100 200 300]};
disp(C)
{[100 200 300]}
out = horzcatcellmat(A,C);
disp(out)
{[ 0 1 100 200 300]} {[ 2 100 200 300]} {[3 4 5 100 200 300]}
function A = horzcatcellmat(A,B)
if nargin == 0
A{1,1} = 1 ;
A{2,1} = 2 ;
A{3,1} = [3 4 5 ];
B{1,1} = 10 ;
B{2,1} = [ ];
B{3,1} = [ 10 11 12];
out = horzcatcellmat(A,B);
disp(out)
C = {[ 100 200 300]};
out = horzcatcellmat(A,C);
disp(out)
else
if size(A,1) == 1 && size(B,1) > 1
A = repmat(A,[size(B,1),1]);
end
if size(B,1) == 1 && size(A,1) > 1
B = repmat(B,[size(A,1),1]);
end
assert(size(A,1), size(B,1),'Size of both arguments are not compatible')
sizY= size(A,1);
% --------- ORIGINAL QUESTION
for ind = 1 : sizY
A(ind) = {horzcat(A{ind},B{ind})};
end
% ---------
% EDIT WITH PROPOSED ANSWERS :
A = cellfun(@(a,b)[a,b], A,B,'UniformOutput',false); % Thx to Matt J
A = cellfun( @horzcat , A,B,'UniformOutput',false); % Thx to Stephen23
%
end
if nargout == 0
A=[];
end
end

2 Kommentare

Dyuman Joshi
Dyuman Joshi am 17 Mär. 2023
Bearbeitet: Dyuman Joshi am 17 Mär. 2023
You might want to address cases when the number of inputs are not equal to 2 (Unless you are sure they won't occur) and the case where A has more rows than B.
Matthieu
Matthieu am 17 Mär. 2023
the 'assert' catches the case if A has not the same number of rows than B.
Indeed, the case if nargin == 1 is not handled...
However, the core question was: How to remove the for loop

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

 Akzeptierte Antwort

Matt J
Matt J am 17 Mär. 2023
Simpler, yes. Faster, no.
A{1,1} = 1 ;
A{2,1} = 2 ;
A{3,1} = [3 4 5 ];
B{1,1} = 10 ;
B{2,1} = [ ];
B{3,1} = [ 10 11 12];
C=cellfun(@(a,b)[a,b], A,B,'uni',0)
C = 3×1 cell array
{[ 1 10]} {[ 2]} {[3 4 5 10 11 12]}

3 Kommentare

Matthieu
Matthieu am 17 Mär. 2023
Bearbeitet: Matthieu am 17 Mär. 2023
Thanks for this solution ! And indeed 'simpler' ... is a question of point of view, maybe not simpler to read ;-) but thanks because no more 'for loop' ;-)
To understand: 'uni',0 ==> C=cellfun(@(a,b)[a,b], A,B,'UniformOutput',false);
cellfun(@horzcat, A,B,'uni',0)
% ^^^^^^^^ simpler
Matthieu
Matthieu am 18 Mär. 2023
Thx Stephen23, simpler to read indeed (to my point of view)

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Weitere Antworten (0)

Produkte

Version

R2022b

Gefragt:

am 17 Mär. 2023

Kommentiert:

am 18 Mär. 2023

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by