Error using inline/subsref (line 12) Not enough inputs to inline function.
Ältere Kommentare anzeigen
Hi, I've been tested so many times and tried all the answers from here and still not working.
if the expression is

with
m=4.541*TN*S0/T
T=1:0.1:100
TN=70
S0=0.99
integration with simpson 1/3
here my code:
clear all; clc;
f1=inline('3/2*(cos(x)^2)*exp(m*(3/2*(cos(x)^2))-1/2)*sin(x)','m','x');
f2=inline('exp(m*(3/2*(cos(x)^2)-1/2))','m','x');
T0=1;
TM=100;
dT=0.1;
TN=70;
S0=0.99;
for T=T0:dT:TM;
m=4.541*TN*S0/T;
a=0;b=pi;
c=0;d=pi;
n=100;
h=(b-a)/n;
f1a=f1(a);f1b=f1(b);
f2a=f2(a);f2b=f2(b);
jumeven=0;jumodd=0;
for i=1:n-1
p=mod(1,2);
if p==0
xi=x+i*h;
jumeven=jumeven+f(xi);
else
xi=x+i*h;
jumodd=jumodd+f(xi);
end
end
I1=(h/3)*(f1a+4*jumodd+2*jumeven+f1b);
I2=(h/3)*(f2c+4*jumodd+2*jumeven+f2d);
S=I1/I2;
S0=S;
end
disp([S' T']);
disp([S]);
plot(S,T,'ob-','linewidth',3);
grid on;
xlabel('S','fontsize',18);
ylabel('T','fontsize',18);
4 Kommentare
Walter Roberson
am 12 Mär. 2022
What advantage do you see in using inline ? Have you benchmarked it for your situation and found it gives better performance? Have you found something using inline that you have not been able to express in other ways?
I ask because Mathworks has recommended against using inline() for roughly the last 18 years.
Michelle Noah
am 12 Mär. 2022
"it's already in my lecturer's guide."
Your lecturer wrote their (mis)guide back in the dark ages. You should ask for your money back.
"And btw, any suggestion from you? I'm happy to try it"
You do what the MATLAB documentation recommends:

Walter Roberson
am 12 Mär. 2022
f1 = @(m,x) 3/2*(cos(x).^2).*exp(m.*(3/2*(cos(x).^2))-1/2).*sin(x);
f2 = @(m,x) exp(m.*(3/2*(cos(x).^2)-1/2));
Akzeptierte Antwort
Weitere Antworten (0)
Kategorien
Mehr zu Function Creation finden Sie in Hilfe-Center und File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!