How to numerically solve and plot definite integral with variable upper limit
195 Ansichten (letzte 30 Tage)
Ältere Kommentare anzeigen
Md Sakiluzzaman
am 3 Mär. 2022
Kommentiert: Md Sakiluzzaman
am 3 Mär. 2022
Where, the limit is P=0:0.1:pi
I have to integrate V and then plot P versus V graph
The x axis need to take as P
clc
close all;
V= @(t) (sin(t)-(x.*cos(t)).*sin(x);
P = 0:0.1:3.1416;
plot(P,V)
0 Kommentare
Akzeptierte Antwort
Alan Stevens
am 3 Mär. 2022
Like so:
K= @(t) (sin(t)-t.*cos(t)).*sin(t);
P = 0:0.1:3.1416;
for i = 1:numel(P)
V(i) = integral(K,0,P(i));
end
plot(P,V),grid
Weitere Antworten (1)
John D'Errico
am 3 Mär. 2022
Bearbeitet: John D'Errico
am 3 Mär. 2022
There are many trivial ways. Off the top of my head ...
- Repeatedly integrate, using a tool like integral, from 0 to x, then plot the result, as a function of x. This scheme is wildly inefficient, since it forces the tool to redo the integration repeatedly over the lower parts of the domain. As such, this scheme is quadratic in time, based on the length of the interval.
- Symbolically integrate the expresssion, with a symbolic upper limit.
- Use cumtrapz.
- Use an ODE solver, something I think many people miss as a solution.
I won't even show how to do solution 1, since it is essentially never what I would recommend. The other solutions would all have their valid purposes though. For example:
K = @(t) (sin(t) - t.*cos(t)).*sin(t)
(Solution 2)
syms T U
Kint = int(K(T),0,U)
fplot(Kint,[0,pi])
xlabel t
ylabel 'Cumulative integral'
grid on
So trivial to do, as long as the expression K has an analytical integral.
(Solution 3)
t = linspace(0,pi);
dt = t(2) - t(1);
plot(t,cumtrapz(dt,K(t)))
xlabel t
ylabel 'Cumulative integral'
grid on
(Solution 4)
ODEFUN = @(t,y) K(t);
y0 = 0;
[tout,yout] = ode45(ODEFUN,[0,pi],y0);
plot(tout,yout)
xlabel t
ylabel 'Cumulative integral'
grid on
As you can see, three essentially identical solutions.
If possible, you would almost always prefer the analytical solution, since it is exact to the extent computations can offer. The cumtrapz solution is the least accurate, since it employs what is implicitly an Euler method, but cumtrapz will be blindingly fast.. Finally, the ODE solver solution is a nice one, since it offers better control over the integration error than a trapezoidal integral, but it will work when no analytical solution can be found.
Siehe auch
Kategorien
Mehr zu Calculus finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!