"Input parser" vs. new "arguments" definition

17 Ansichten (letzte 30 Tage)
Stefan Sp.
Stefan Sp. am 17 Jan. 2022
Bearbeitet: Stephen23 am 26 Jun. 2023
R2019b introduced the new "arguments" section for function argument checking and parsing.
I hahe written some functions using the "old" input parser class. Are there any advantages to switch to the new syntax?
Is it worth to update my functions to the new syntax? (sure, I know, "never change a running system")
regards, Stefan
  1 Kommentar
chicken vector
chicken vector am 7 Apr. 2023
Hi Stefan, this is a question of great interest.
Have you figured out an answer yet? I am implementing a library and I can't choose what to use.

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Antworten (1)

埃博拉酱
埃博拉酱 am 7 Apr. 2023
Bearbeitet: 埃博拉酱 am 7 Apr. 2023
The biggest advantage of the arguments block is readability, but it is far less flexible than varargin. People who are not familiar with your code can quickly understand your parameter requirements through the arguments block.
Another potential advantage may be ease of compiler optimization. Overly flexible varargin is difficult to optimize for performance.
  4 Kommentare
Simon
Simon am 26 Jun. 2023
I have the same question. Both inputParser and arguments are unfamiliar to me.
Stephen23
Stephen23 am 26 Jun. 2023
Bearbeitet: Stephen23 am 26 Jun. 2023
@chicken vector: you can always use a comma-separated list, which works on every MATLAB version**:
options = {"parameters1", 1, "parameter2", 'foo', "parameter3", true}
myfunction(requiredInput, options{:})
** with cell arrays. AFAIK comma-separated lists were introduced at the same time.

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Kategorien

Mehr zu Argument Definitions finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange

Produkte


Version

R2019b

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by