Efficiently identifying a set of 1s: follow up question after months later
1 Ansicht (letzte 30 Tage)
Ältere Kommentare anzeigen
I asked a question that had my working but an inefficient code. It was answered.
The task was to efficiently identify a set of 1s in an array containing 1s,0s and -1. The solution was working when the array was like below
a = [1 1 1 -1 0 0 0 0 1 1 -1 0 0 1 1 1 1 -1 0 0]; %original question array
but now when it is as below, it is unable to identify the indices where a set of 1s start.
a=[1 1 -1 1 1 1 -1 0 0]; % current array
The difference w.r.t the original question array and this current array is only that now, the set of 1s are next to another set of 1s separated by the marker, -1. Whereas in the original question, there were some 0's in between. Can anyone please help me on this or even suggest an answer in alternative to the accepted answer as the task is still the same.
0 Kommentare
Akzeptierte Antwort
Stephen23
am 4 Dez. 2021
Bearbeitet: Stephen23
am 4 Dez. 2021
A simpler, more efficient, much more robust solution:
a = [1,1,1,-1,0,0,0,0,1,1,-1,0,0,1,1,1,1,-1,0,0];
d = diff([false,a==1,false]);
s = find(d>0) % start
e = find(d<0)-1 % end
And tested on your new data set:
a = [1,1,-1,1,1,1,-1,0,0];
d = diff([false,a==1,false]);
s = find(d>0) % start
e = find(d<0)-1 % end
Weitere Antworten (0)
Siehe auch
Kategorien
Mehr zu Matrix Indexing finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange
Produkte
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!