mrdivide for sparse blockdiagonal matrices
3 Ansichten (letzte 30 Tage)
Ältere Kommentare anzeigen
when computing A/B where A and B are sparse block diagonal and have the same block structure, does it matter in terms of computation time whether to:
1. construct A and B as sparse matrices, and then compute C=A/B 2. for each block i, compute C_i=A_i/B_i, store them in a cell Ccell, and then define C=blkdiag(Ccell{:})
0 Kommentare
Antworten (1)
Fangjun Jiang
am 3 Sep. 2011
I don't know. You could write a test to find out. From the code below, it seems that as N grows, approach 2 is faster.
N=20;
a=cell(N,1);
b=cell(N,1);
for k=1:N
a{k}=rand(k);
b{k}=rand(k);
end
t1=0;t2=0;
for k=1:100
tic;
A=blkdiag(a{:});
B=blkdiag(b{:});
C=A/B;
t1=t1+toc;
tic;
d=cell(N,1);
for j=1:N
d{j}=a{j}/b{j};
end
D=blkdiag(d{:});
t2=t2+toc;
end
fprintf('time for approach 1: %f\n',t1);
fprintf('time for approach 2: %f\n',t2);
time for approach 1: 0.503683
time for approach 2: 0.129935
0 Kommentare
Siehe auch
Kategorien
Mehr zu Sparse Matrices finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!