Statistik
RANG
269.882
of 301.895
REPUTATION
0
ANTWORTZUSTIMMUNG
0.0%
ERHALTENE STIMMEN
0
RANG
of 21.447
REPUTATION
N/A
DURCHSCHNITTLICHE BEWERTUNG
0.00
BEITRÄGE
0 Dateien
DOWNLOADS
0
ALL TIME DOWNLOADS
0
RANG
of 177.188
BEITRÄGE
0 Probleme
0 Lösungen
PUNKTESTAND
0
ANZAHL DER ABZEICHEN
0
BEITRÄGE
0 Beiträge
BEITRÄGE
0 Öffentlich Kanäle
DURCHSCHNITTLICHE BEWERTUNG
BEITRÄGE
0 Discussions
DURCHSCHNITTLICHE ANZAHL DER LIKES
Feeds
Beantwortet
why real part of fft (exp(at)) is negative in some parts in contrary to analytical calculation of fft(exp(at))?
Thanks for the reply. I agree with you that symmetry is important. But my problem is about the real values calculated from FFT. ...
why real part of fft (exp(at)) is negative in some parts in contrary to analytical calculation of fft(exp(at))?
Thanks for the reply. I agree with you that symmetry is important. But my problem is about the real values calculated from FFT. ...
etwa 14 Jahre vor | 0
Frage
why real part of fft (exp(at)) is negative in some parts in contrary to analytical calculation of fft(exp(at))?
Hi, I want to calculate the *real part* of fourier transform of A = exp(at) where "a" is a constant and t = [0 T]. when I calc...
etwa 14 Jahre vor | 2 Antworten | 0
