Statistik
RANG
115.911
of 300.886
REPUTATION
0
ANTWORTZUSTIMMUNG
0.0%
ERHALTENE STIMMEN
0
RANG
of 21.104
REPUTATION
N/A
DURCHSCHNITTLICHE BEWERTUNG
0.00
BEITRÄGE
0 Dateien
DOWNLOADS
0
ALL TIME DOWNLOADS
0
RANG
of 171.502
BEITRÄGE
0 Probleme
0 Lösungen
PUNKTESTAND
0
ANZAHL DER ABZEICHEN
0
BEITRÄGE
0 Beiträge
BEITRÄGE
0 Öffentlich Kanäle
DURCHSCHNITTLICHE BEWERTUNG
BEITRÄGE
0 Discussions
DURCHSCHNITTLICHE ANZAHL DER LIKES
Feeds
Beantwortet
why real part of fft (exp(at)) is negative in some parts in contrary to analytical calculation of fft(exp(at))?
Thanks for the reply. I agree with you that symmetry is important. But my problem is about the real values calculated from FFT. ...
why real part of fft (exp(at)) is negative in some parts in contrary to analytical calculation of fft(exp(at))?
Thanks for the reply. I agree with you that symmetry is important. But my problem is about the real values calculated from FFT. ...
mehr als 13 Jahre vor | 0
Frage
why real part of fft (exp(at)) is negative in some parts in contrary to analytical calculation of fft(exp(at))?
Hi, I want to calculate the *real part* of fourier transform of A = exp(at) where "a" is a constant and t = [0 T]. when I calc...
mehr als 13 Jahre vor | 2 Antworten | 0
