Statistik
RANG
241.442
of 301.617
REPUTATION
0
ANTWORTZUSTIMMUNG
0.0%
ERHALTENE STIMMEN
0
RANG
of 21.359
REPUTATION
N/A
DURCHSCHNITTLICHE BEWERTUNG
0.00
BEITRÄGE
0 Dateien
DOWNLOADS
0
ALL TIME DOWNLOADS
0
RANG
of 175.795
BEITRÄGE
0 Probleme
0 Lösungen
PUNKTESTAND
0
ANZAHL DER ABZEICHEN
0
BEITRÄGE
0 Beiträge
BEITRÄGE
0 Öffentlich Kanäle
DURCHSCHNITTLICHE BEWERTUNG
BEITRÄGE
0 Discussions
DURCHSCHNITTLICHE ANZAHL DER LIKES
Feeds
Bug in BLE performance simulation
One other way for us to try to converge on this is for me to ask this: where did you come up with the formula snrVec = EbNo ...
mehr als 5 Jahre vor | 0
Bug in BLE performance simulation
What does "E" refer to in your formula? I think we're in agreement on what Eb/No means - it's a commonly used term in digital ...
mehr als 5 Jahre vor | 0
Bug in BLE performance simulation
I'm OK with the way you're handling sps (samples per symbol) in your simulation. You're using it to lower the SNR by 10*log(sps)...
mehr als 5 Jahre vor | 0
Bug in BLE performance simulation
Hi Deepak - The correct formula mapping Eb/N0 to SNR doesn't depend on the code rate per se. It depends on the ratio R of the ...
mehr als 5 Jahre vor | 0
Frage
Bug in BLE performance simulation
I think there could be a bug in and around these two lines of this Matlab sim. codeRate = 1/2; snrVec = EbNo + 10...
mehr als 5 Jahre vor | 6 Antworten | 0
