How do I efficiently calculate a scalar distance with 3d geometry?

9 Ansichten (letzte 30 Tage)
Henry
Henry am 29 Jul. 2013
I have a piece of code that is called many times (~5e5) during a time stepping solution. Having run profiler, the following line is slowing everything down:
r2 = sqrt((x-x2).*(x-x2)+(y-y2).*(y-y2)+(z-z2).*(z-z2));
Where x, y, z are (500, 1) and x2, y2, z2 are scalars.
Any suggestions?
Thanks!

Antworten (2)

Matt J
Matt J am 29 Jul. 2013
This might speed things up,
Haven't used it myself, though.
  2 Kommentare
Matt J
Matt J am 30 Jul. 2013
Bearbeitet: Matt J am 30 Jul. 2013
It should also help (a little) if you don't compute x-x2 etc... twice. So in other words, you would first do
dx=x-x2;
dy=y-y2;
dz=z-z2;
and then
r2 = sqrt(dx.*dx +dy.*dy +dz.*dz);
or whatever...
Jan
Jan am 30 Jul. 2013
DNorm2 requires matrices as input and creating [dx, dy, dz] at first wastes too much time. So if the data could be organized as [500 x 3] matrix instead of three vectors, DNorm2 would be an option.

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.


Richard Brown
Richard Brown am 29 Jul. 2013
Bearbeitet: Richard Brown am 29 Jul. 2013
You should use hypot. It also has better numerical stability.
edit sorry, you're in 3D. That obviously won't work. You can use hypot as
r = hypot((x-x2) + 1i*(y-y2), z - z2);
This may be slower than what you currently have though. If you use (x - x2).^2 instead of (x - x2) .* (x - x2) you'll probably get a small performance boost. Can you avoid calculating the square root and work with squared distance instead?

Kategorien

Mehr zu Creating and Concatenating Matrices finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange

Tags

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by