Improving the speed of code with passing to a function input a cell array or structure.
2 Ansichten (letzte 30 Tage)
Ältere Kommentare anzeigen
George Bashkatov
am 3 Apr. 2021
Kommentiert: George Bashkatov
am 4 Apr. 2021
I'm trying to pass some amount of numerical data as a function input.
I had that row in my code:
[z1,y1]=ode45(@(z,y) famplifire(sigma_pa,N0,sigma_pe,sigma_se,k,y,z),zspan,startval);
I'm trying to replace four parameters: sigma_pa,N0,sigma_pe,sigma_se. I've tryed to replace them with cell array, but the time of execution of code nevertheless rises. So I had some questions:
1) Using of cell arrays insted of usual numerical data can improve quickness of my code?
2) I had another idea to use a struct, but I don't know how. If you can, give me some advices (or simple examples) please. Or I can make another question with my code.
0 Kommentare
Akzeptierte Antwort
Matt J
am 3 Apr. 2021
Bearbeitet: Matt J
am 3 Apr. 2021
We can't see what famplifire [sic.] is doing with your variables so there isn't any specific comments that can be made. However, the rule of thumb is basically that if you must loop through a small number of large arrays/matrices, it can be advantageous to hold them in cells. Otherwise, it is probably better to concatenate them into a single array.
Structures are essentially the same as cell arrays. They are just indexed differently.
3 Kommentare
Matt J
am 3 Apr. 2021
If the C{i} are all scalars, it would be better if C were numeric rather than a cell array
Weitere Antworten (0)
Siehe auch
Kategorien
Mehr zu Creating and Concatenating Matrices finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!