different behaviour when concatenating table colums
2 Ansichten (letzte 30 Tage)
Ältere Kommentare anzeigen
The two lines behave differently:
tmp = [all_table.('SpO2_FiO2');myTable.('SpO2_FiO2')]; % this works
tmp = [all_table(:,52);myTable(:,52)]; % this gives error 'Cannot concatenate the table variable 'SpO2_FiO2' because it is a cell in one table and a non-cell in another.'
52 is the column index to the column named ''SpO2_FiO2". The type of this column is double in both tables, all_table and my_Table.
0 Kommentare
Antworten (1)
Voss
am 23 Dez. 2021
If both tables' SpO2_FiO2 columns are actually doubles, then both ways of concatenating do the same thing:
SpO2_FiO2 = (1:3).';
all_table = table(SpO2_FiO2)
myTable = table(SpO2_FiO2)
tmp = [all_table.('SpO2_FiO2');myTable.('SpO2_FiO2')]
tmp = [all_table(:,1);myTable(:,1)]
If instead one table's SpO2_FiO2 column is a cell array, then you get behavior consistent with what you observe:
SpO2_FiO2 = (1:3).';
all_table = table(SpO2_FiO2)
SpO2_FiO2 = num2cell(SpO2_FiO2);
myTable = table(SpO2_FiO2)
tmp = [all_table.('SpO2_FiO2');myTable.('SpO2_FiO2')]
tmp = [all_table(:,1);myTable(:,1)]
In the second case, the line:
tmp = [all_table.('SpO2_FiO2');myTable.('SpO2_FiO2')];
does not generate an error, but it doesn't necessarily 'work' because it doesn't necessarily do what you want. It gives a 4-by-1 cell array where the first element is a 3-by-1 vector of doubles and the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th elements are all scalar doubles, as opposed to a 6-by-1 vector of doubles, which is what you get either way you do the concatenation when both columns are actually doubles.
0 Kommentare
Siehe auch
Kategorien
Mehr zu Tables finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!