Why do I get dead-logic on transitions which can be excited through some test scenarios?
3 Ansichten (letzte 30 Tage)
Ältere Kommentare anzeigen
Ilkay Ataol
am 19 Feb. 2021
Beantwortet: Pat Canny
am 19 Feb. 2021
I have this stateflow diagram shown below. When I made error detection analysis on this stateflow chart, there are two transitions which are shown as dead-logic. I know that there are test scenarios that can excite these transitions so I wonder why I get dead-logic errors on these transitions. How should I change my stateflow chart in order to eliminate dead-logic errors? Thanks in advance.
0 Kommentare
Akzeptierte Antwort
Pat Canny
am 19 Feb. 2021
Hi Ilkay,
Great question. We have seen similar cases to this.
Here is what is happening:
In each case, we have (taking for example state x):
A == 1 as the first transition. This generates 2 objectives: A == 1 true and A == 1 false
A ~= 1 is the second transition and has two objectives as well: A ~= 1 true and A ~= 1 false
The A ~= 1 false is not reachable (the objective is "dead"), because it corresponds to exactly the case where A == 1 is true (which means Design Verifier would never check that transition because the first transition is always true).
How to fix: since the second transition corresponds exactly to the case where the first condition is true, you can replace the [A ~= 1] and [B ~= 1] with default transitions (with no label). This does the exact same thing.
0 Kommentare
Weitere Antworten (0)
Siehe auch
Kategorien
Mehr zu Simulink Design Verifier finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!