Galois field array generation...issues!

for the given code:
primpoly = 1 0 1 1
m = 4( assumed)
indx = [0:1:2.^m-1]; %power index
for r = 1:length(indx)
U = gftuple(indx,primpoly,p)
end
I want U to be listed out in a p.^m-1 by m+1 array and not separately. so that i can access each row of U for further computation. but with the above i get U separately for each loop run and the previous U is over-written.
Also, Can i code it without using gftuple, like without any built-in function?

 Akzeptierte Antwort

Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson am 20 Apr. 2013

1 Stimme

U(r,:) = gftuple(indx,primpoly,p);

10 Kommentare

Malik
Malik am 20 Apr. 2013
Bearbeitet: Malik am 20 Apr. 2013
this generates only one U at the end several times. I want all possible U's generated by the loop to be saved up in ONE matrix/table. the o/p here is:
U =
1 0 1
1 0 1
1 0 1
1 0 1
1 0 1
1 0 1
1 0 1
1 0 1
several times! which is not the desired output.
U(r,:) = gftuple(indx(r),primpoly,p);
Malik
Malik am 20 Apr. 2013
yes this gives the right output but several times if i do not put ';' this means U is being produced several times, cant it be reduced to just once....n Thanks!
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson am 20 Apr. 2013
Sorry, I do not have the Communications Toolbox to test with.
Are all of the output U's exactly the same? When there is an assignment to part of an array and you do not have a semi-colon, MATLAB outputs the entire array.
the output U is as follows:
U =
1 0 0
0 1 0
0 0 1
1 0 1
1 1 1
1 1 0
0 1 1
1 0 0
But my objective was to call this U once but here this U gets repeated 8 times (the exact same U, dont know why).
Is your code line literally
primpoly = 1 0 1 1
instead of
primpoly = [1 0 1 1]
??
I do not know why the output would be exactly the same each time when indx(r) is used, but I do see in the documentation that you do not need the loop.
U = gftuple( indx(:), primpoly, p )
Notice passing in a column of indices instead of the row you were using.
Malik
Malik am 20 Apr. 2013
well U = gftuple( indx(:), primpoly, p ) actually works! Thanks! and yes it is supposed to be [1 0 1 1].
Malik
Malik am 20 Apr. 2013
Is there some way to code this gf tuple function without using the built-in function?
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson am 20 Apr. 2013
Probably, but I have not researched to find out what the expected output would be.

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Weitere Antworten (0)

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by