Hey, it's me again, this time I want to shift a fit I created with cftool:
[xData, yData] = prepareCurveData( Fqr, Prem );
% Set up fittype and options.
ft = fittype( 'a*atan(2*b*t/3.83^2-t^2)', 'independent', 't', 'dependent', 'y' );
opts = fitoptions( 'Method', 'NonlinearLeastSquares' );
opts.Display = 'Off';
opts.StartPoint = [0.0496544303257421 0.902716109915281];
% Fit model to data.
[fitresult, gof] = fit( xData, yData, ft, opts );
% Plot fit with data.
figure( 'Name', 'untitled fit 1' );
h = plot( fitresult, xData, yData,'x');
set(h,'LineWidth',2,'Markersize',7.5)
legend( h, 'Prem vs. Fqr', 'untitled fit 1', 'Location', 'NorthEast', 'Interpreter', 'none' );
% Label axes
xlabel( 'Fqr', 'Interpreter', 'none' );
ylabel( 'Prem', 'Interpreter', 'none' );
grid on
I manage to relcoate y values just by typing +pi/2 behind yData, but what about the fitted line? That's where I'm struggling.

 Akzeptierte Antwort

Dana
Dana am 24 Jun. 2020

1 Stimme

Why not just shift up the raw y data?
[xData, tmp] = prepareCurveData( Fqr, Prem );
yData = tmp+pi/2; % shift up your y data values
Then everything else would be the same as you had.

5 Kommentare

Niklas Kurz
Niklas Kurz am 24 Jun. 2020
Bearbeitet: Niklas Kurz am 24 Jun. 2020
well, that is just shifting the Markers (y-values), but not the line. Thing is, I tried fitting with y values +pi/2 in advance, but fit is not working. I suspect it's because of atan function.
That's why my reasoning goes like fitting with -pi/2 (bc that's working surprisingly) and add +pi/2 back on at the end of the day.
Okay, I see now the issue. Because you don't have a constant term in your regression specification, what I suggested before won't work. Before going any further, let me ask you: are you sure you don't want a constant term in your regression? Generally you'd need a compelling reason to not include one. It happens, but it's relatively uncommon.
If you did include one, you'd have something like
ft = fittype( 'c+a*atan(2*b*t/3.83^2-t^2)', 'independent', 't', 'dependent', 'y' );
where now c is the constant term. With that specification, you can then just add pi/2 to your yData as I suggested before, and it won't do anything except shift the data and fitted curve up by a constant pi/2.
If you're sure you don't want a constant term, then a slight modification of what I wrote before would work:
[xData, tmp] = prepareCurveData( Fqr, Prem );
yData = tmp+pi/2;
% Set up fittype and options.
ft = fittype( 'a*atan(2*b*t/3.83^2-t^2)+pi/2', 'independent', 't', 'dependent', 'y' );
So now pi/2 has been added to both the data and the regression specification. Everything after that would be the same as in your original post.
Niklas Kurz
Niklas Kurz am 24 Jun. 2020
By adding a constant it doesn't align anymore, bc c is assigned with a weird value. Or I am just hard of understanding. However your second option just works perfectly, many thanks.
Dana
Dana am 24 Jun. 2020
When including the estimated constant c in your regression specification, you'll get the exact same shape of fitted curve whether or not you first add pi/2 to yData, the only difference is the curve will be shifted by a constant.
However, you won't generally get the same shape of fitted curve if you're comparing "with constant c, and with pi/2 added to yData" to "without constant c, and without pi/2 added to yData". In that case, only one of your specifications involves estimating a constant, so there's no reason to think you should get the same shape of curve. Hope that clarifies.
Niklas Kurz
Niklas Kurz am 25 Jun. 2020
Thank you for the clarification!

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Weitere Antworten (0)

Kategorien

Mehr zu Get Started with Curve Fitting Toolbox finden Sie in Hilfe-Center und File Exchange

Tags

Gefragt:

am 24 Jun. 2020

Kommentiert:

am 25 Jun. 2020

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by