When using parallel computing, why wait?

In the parallel computing toolbox, there is an option "wait", to suspend the local matlab session until the remote job is completed. This option is commonly used in examples. I have a basic confusion regarding this: does this defies the purpose of running job remotely, or in parallel? what would be the advantages of waiting?

 Akzeptierte Antwort

Matt J
Matt J am 30 Sep. 2012
Bearbeitet: Matt J am 30 Sep. 2012

0 Stimmen

When coding, you often have a sequence of tasks, some of which are serial and some of which are parallelized. The parallelized tasks shouldn't pass their output forward to a serial task until all parallel workers have finished. Otherwise, they may pass forward partially processed data. Hence, you have wait commands to let all parallel workers catch up.
Does that make sense? Maybe I need to see the example you're thinking of.

3 Kommentare

Moshe
Moshe am 30 Sep. 2012
I am thinking mainly about sending (serial) batch jobs to a cluster, any reason for me to wait, anything I am missing?
Matt J
Matt J am 30 Sep. 2012
It depends what you're doing after that. If whatever you're doing afterward relies on all batches being finished, then you should wait until all batches are finished.
Moshe
Moshe am 30 Sep. 2012
Thanks, that makes sense.

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Weitere Antworten (0)

Kategorien

Mehr zu Parallel Computing Toolbox finden Sie in Hilfe-Center und File Exchange

Gefragt:

am 30 Sep. 2012

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by