I am looking for an efficient way of doing randperm(n,k) many successive times with the same n and k. Can anyone propose something more efficient than the obvious for-loop approach below?
M=1e5;
n=100;
k=10;
A=nan(k,M);
for i=1:M
A(:,i) = randperm(n,k).';
end

 Akzeptierte Antwort

Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson am 31 Dez. 2018

0 Stimmen

In current versions of MATLAB, randperm with small k relative to n (and perhaps other cases) uses a Fisher-Yates shuffle for efficiency.
Older versions of MATLAB use sort(rand) to extract orderings. That can be extended easily:
[~, A] = sort( rand(n, M) );

2 Kommentare

Matt J
Matt J am 1 Jan. 2019
Bearbeitet: Matt J am 1 Jan. 2019
Ah! Thanks. I suppose we should use mink/maxk, though, for Matlab versions that have it
[~, A] = mink( rand(n, M) , k ); ?
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson am 1 Jan. 2019
Bearbeitet: Walter Roberson am 1 Jan. 2019
Good idea. On older systems, you would use A(1:k,:)
... Though I just did some timing tests, and using sort and indexing turns out to be measurably faster. Using sort and indexing is bout 0.125 for the parameters you indicate, vs about 0.156 for using mink.

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Weitere Antworten (0)

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by