Hi, I try to find the minimum of a sum. It does work for a fixed parameter for 'test', but I want to show it for various values of 'test'. I always get the error saying: "Index exceeds array bounds" in the line where I define 'c_hat = single(c_hat(1))', what is wrong in my code? (In the end I want to plot the results for each value of test(j), I deleted this in the code shared to make it more simple.) I would be very thankful if you can help me!
lambda = 0.95; %close to 1
n = 100; %number of samples
theta = 0.03;
alph = 2.5; %divergence level
%Generate Pareto distributed r.v.:
x_m = 1; %scale parameter for Pareto
alpha = 3; %shape parameter for Pareto
pd = makedist('uniform');
u = random(pd,[1,n]);
X = zeros(1,n);
for i=1:n
X(i) = x_m / (1-u(i))^(1/alpha); %Pareto distributed r.v.
end
a_1 = x_m / (1-lambda).^(1/alpha)
V = zeros(n,1);
a=a_1;
for i=1:n
V(i) = 1/(1-lambda) .* max(X(i)-a,0) + a;
end
k=20;
test=linspace(0,10,k);
E=zeros(k,1);
rel_entropy=zeros(k,1);
alph_div = zeros(k,1);
a_hat = zeros(k,1);
for j=1:k
syms c
summe_5=0;
for i=1:n
summe_5 = summe_5 + (test(j)*(alph -1)*V(i) + c)^(1/(alph-1));
end
cond = (1/n)* summe_5 == 1;
c_hat = zeros(3,1);
for q = 1:3
c_hat = vpasolve(cond,c, 'random', true) ;
end
c_hat = single(c_hat(1))
%syms b
size(c_hat)
M_b = @(b) ((alph-1)/alph) * sum((test(j).*(alph-1) .* (1/(1-lambda) .* max(X-b,0)+b) + c_hat).^(1/(alph-1)).*(1/(1-lambda) .* max(X-b,0)+b)) + (c_hat/(test(j) .* alph * (1-alph)));
a_hat(j) = fminsearch(M_b,a_1);
V_a = zeros(n,1);
for i=1:n
V_a(i) = 1/(1-lambda) .* max(X(i)-a_hat(j),0) + a_hat(j);
end
m_hat = zeros(n,1);
for i=1:n
m_hat(i) = (test(j) * (alph-1) * V_a(i)+ c_hat) .^(1/(alph-1));
end
E(j)= (1/n) * sum(V.*m_hat);
%plotting results
end

 Akzeptierte Antwort

Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson am 8 Aug. 2018

0 Stimmen

You would get that if vpasolve is returning empty.
What is the purpose of your q loop in which you vpasolve three times but do not permanently save the first two results?

3 Kommentare

Verena Schnieders
Verena Schnieders am 8 Aug. 2018
Bearbeitet: Verena Schnieders am 8 Aug. 2018
Oh I needed that for another file, I checked whether all results are the same. I do not necessarily need to solve it several times in this case, sorry. But it is still the same error, even without the loop and only computing c_hat once.
I confirm that when j = 5, that the generated cond has no solutions over real values -- or at least that was the case with whatever random number seed happened to get used when I tried.
You generate an expression that looks like
(1/100)*(c+5247771914842387/35184372088832)^(2/3)+97*(c+301594987663439/35184372088832)^(2/3)*(1/100)+(1/100)*(c+6102129260550525/140737488355328)^(2/3)+(1/100)*(c+290574697259709/549755813888)^(2/3) == 1
Take the minimum of the values that are being added to c, and take the negative of that value. If c goes lower than that value then you would be raising a negative value to 2/3, which would give a complex result. So by looking at your
(test(j)*(alph -1)*V(i) + c)^(1/(alph-1)
terms and breaking that down to
test(j)*(alph -1)*V(i)
and finding the minimum of those, and taking the negative, you get a lower bound on where to search. If the value of
(1/n)* summe_5
is greater than 1 at that point, then there cannot be any real-valued solutions (because the other terms will all be greater value.)
Verena Schnieders
Verena Schnieders am 14 Aug. 2018
Thank you! I fixed the error, I only choose test to be in the interval of (0,1), then the sum is alright and everything works out fine :-)

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Weitere Antworten (0)

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by