Activations of freezed layers are different between before/after training, why?

1 Ansicht (letzte 30 Tage)
I follow the example "transfer-learning-using-googlenet" where, the last 3 layers ('loss3-classifier','prob','output') are replaced with 3 new ones. Then I 'freeze' the first 141 layers (that is up to and including 'pool5-drop_7x7_s1'):
layers(1:141) = freezeWeights(layers(1:141));
lgraph = createLgraphUsingConnections(layers,connections);
Then I follow fine-tuning.
Since 'pool5-7x7_s1' is BEFORE 'pool5-drop_7x7_s1', I would expect that the following two vectors were the same:
b_orig= activations(net_orig, I, 'pool5-7x7_s1');
b_tune= activations(net_tune, I, 'pool5-7x7_s1');
but they aren't!... Any idea why?
p.s. I also tried the activation of several other layers BEFORE 'pool5-drop_7x7_s1', and I got different vectors.... 'I' is an image, 'net_orig=googlenet;', and 'net_tune' is the resulting net after tuning.
  2 Kommentare
conngame
conngame am 15 Jul. 2018
I have the same problem using alexnet. Any explanations to this question?
ntinoson
ntinoson am 17 Jul. 2018
I did also try other CNNs, and same result. Activation of freezed layers after fine-tuning is different to that before fine-tuning (for the same input image of course). If anyone comes up with an explanation, drop a line!

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Akzeptierte Antwort

Amanjit Dulai
Amanjit Dulai am 14 Aug. 2018
The vectors are different because when you fine tune on a new dataset, the average image in "imageInputLayer" is recalculated for your new dataset.
  2 Kommentare
ntinoson
ntinoson am 27 Aug. 2018
ok, i see, thanks!
p.s. if 'normalization' was set to 'none' (i.e. NO data transformation applied, I guess the vectors would be the same, right?)

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Weitere Antworten (0)

Kategorien

Mehr zu Image Data Workflows finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by