Filter löschen
Filter löschen

Finding the Maximum of 6 matrices

1 Ansicht (letzte 30 Tage)
serena solanki
serena solanki am 24 Apr. 2018
Beantwortet: Siyu Guo am 29 Apr. 2018
I have 6 41*41 matrices. They contain peak displacement data for a combination of variables which I have changed
I.e. I would have a matrix which would look like this for example: where the kiso values are going down and the ciso vaules are going across and the values are the correspsonding data for each combination.
M1=
ciso
kiso 1 2 3
1 3.4 3 0.5
2 8 5.6 0.23
3 2 4.3 0.56
M2=
ciso
kiso 1 2 3
1 4 5 6
2 0.1 5.2 0.2
3 9 4 0.5
Max=
ciso
kiso 1 2 3
1 4 5 6
2 8 5.6 0.23
3 9 4.3 0.56
How do I compare each matrix and build a separate matrix which has the maximum value for each kiso and ciso combination as I have done in the example?
I have tried the matrix max comparison max(A,B) etc but I get an error saying there are too many input arguments as I am comparing 6 matrices not 2. max_building=max(Peak_mat1,Peak_mat2,Peak_mat3,Peak_mat4,Peak_mat5,Peak_mat6);
Thanks in advance

Antworten (3)

njj1
njj1 am 24 Apr. 2018
You can use max(X,[],dim) to specify the dimension from which to compute the maximum value. For example, if you let dim=2, then this computes the maximum value across each row of your matrix, resulting in a column vector; while dim=1 takes the maximum over each column of your matrix, resulting in a row vector. You could also try to re-arrange your data into a 41x41x6 array, where each "slice" in this 3-D cube is one of your original matrices. If you then entered max(X,[],3), you would get a 41x41 matrix where each entry is the maximum value of that particular (i,j) location for each of the 6 41x41 matrices. You could then pare this down into a maximum value for all columns and all rows over all the 6 matrices. One way to do this is: max(max(X,[],3),[],2) to get the max across each row for all 6 arrays. To do this same thing for columns: max(max(X,[],3),[],1). Hope this helps!
  1 Kommentar
serena solanki
serena solanki am 29 Apr. 2018
Thank you very much for this!
I will try and combine the matrices into a 41*41*6 array. I am a little unsure how to save the data into an array as I want to make sure its in the right order.
Thanks,
Serena

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.


dpb
dpb am 24 Apr. 2018
The problem is the creation of sequentially named variables instead of using a form of data storage that makes addressing the data easy programmatically.
The simplest conceptually for the 2D arrays would be to create a 3D array where each of the six is a plane (3rd dimension); then you can simply address each by the desired index 1 thru 6.
If you create the M array in that fashion for the above case you'd have
M(:,:,1) =
3.4000 3.0000 0.5000
8.0000 5.6000 0.2300
2.0000 4.3000 0.5600
M(:,:,2) =
4.0000 5.0000 6.0000
0.1000 5.2000 0.2000
9.0000 4.0000 0.5000
>>
and the desired max are simply
>> max(M,[],3)
ans =
4.0000 5.0000 6.0000
8.0000 5.6000 0.2300
9.0000 4.3000 0.5600
>>
  1 Kommentar
serena solanki
serena solanki am 29 Apr. 2018
So as long as I call each matrix M(:,:1)----M(:,:,6) I can use the max(M,[],3) ?? or would I have to use 41 i.e. max(M,[],41) as I have 41 columns ??
I just want to make sure I have understood what you have said.
Thanks,
Serena

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.


Siyu Guo
Siyu Guo am 29 Apr. 2018
Guess max(cat(3,M1,M2,M3,M4,M5,M6), [], 3) should do.

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by