Is the Zeroes Function here necessary?

1 Ansicht (letzte 30 Tage)
Andew
Andew am 21 Feb. 2018
Kommentiert: Stephen23 am 21 Feb. 2018
Here is the code:
nuclei=zeros(1,100);
t=nuclei;
nuclei(1)=input('Enter initial number of nuclei: ');
t(1)=0;
t_c=input('Enter time constant: ');
dt=input('Time step: ');
for i=1:99
nuclei(i+1)=nuclei(i)-(nuclei(i)/t_c)*dt;
t(i+1)=t(i)+dt;
end
plot(t,nuclei,'-ok','MarkerFaceColor','k')
xlabel('Number of Nuclei','FontWeight','bold')
ylabel('time(s)','FontWeight','bold')
title('Radioactive Decay Number of nuclei versus time')
str1=['Time Constant= ' num2str(t_c) ' s '];
str2=['Time Step= ' num2str(dt) ' s'];
text(t(50),nuclei(10),str1,'FontWeight','bold','FontSize',14)
text(t(50),nuclei(20),str2,'FontWeight','bold','FontSize',14)
I have plots that result from this code, and this code with that first line removed, and they appear to be the same. Is that first line necessary? If so, why?
  1 Kommentar
Stephen23
Stephen23 am 21 Feb. 2018
No code is "necessary".
In this situation zeros makes that code much more efficient: array preallocation means that MATLAB does not waste time moving data around in memory:

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Akzeptierte Antwort

Greg
Greg am 21 Feb. 2018
It's called pre-allocation. It is always a good idea to pre-allocate. If you need a quick proof, throw a tic / toc around the code with and without the zeros line. It'll get noticeably faster as the number of loop iterations grows.
  2 Kommentare
Andew
Andew am 21 Feb. 2018
thanks!
Greg
Greg am 21 Feb. 2018
Happy to help.

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Weitere Antworten (0)

Tags

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by