How to speed up my code and improve/avoid for loop

12 Ansichten (letzte 30 Tage)
Sergei Zhuravlev
Sergei Zhuravlev am 12 Okt. 2017
Bearbeitet: Sergei Zhuravlev am 12 Okt. 2017
Dear all, that's my piece of code that works correctly but too slow.
T=rand(100000,1)-0.3;
eTG=zeros(size(T)); %set eTG(1)=0 and preallocate
for i=2:length(T)
eTG(i)=eTG(i-1)+T(i-1);
eTG(i(eTG(i)>0))=0;
end
Preallocation doesn't help and "run and time" tool shows that string
eTG(i(eTG(i)>0))=0;
eats 83% of the total time. Please give me your advices how to optimize this code. Are there any ways to vectorize this code and avoid loops at all?
  5 Kommentare
Sergei Zhuravlev
Sergei Zhuravlev am 12 Okt. 2017
Bearbeitet: Sergei Zhuravlev am 12 Okt. 2017
Yes, exactly. Using max function gives wrong results, Should be "min" I suppose. Thank you!
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson am 12 Okt. 2017
Dang, I got it wrong this time too. Yes, min(0, eTG(i)) if you want negative untouched and positive set to 0.

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Antworten (1)

Sergei Zhuravlev
Sergei Zhuravlev am 12 Okt. 2017
Bearbeitet: Sergei Zhuravlev am 12 Okt. 2017
This code is 10 times faster (thanks to Walter Roberson)
T=rand(100000,1)-0.3;
eTG=zeros(size(T)); %set eTG(1)=0 and preallocate
for i=2:length(T)
eTG(i)=eTG(i-1)+T(i-1);
eTG(i) = min(0, eTG(i));
end

Kategorien

Mehr zu Parallel Computing Toolbox finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange

Tags

Produkte

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by