Improving performance of interp1 function inside for loop

3 Ansichten (letzte 30 Tage)
Arya
Arya am 23 Aug. 2016
Bearbeitet: Arya am 24 Aug. 2016
Hello,
I'm looking for some insight on troubleshooting a matlab fcn bottleneck in a Simulink project. According to the code profiler this Matlab in-line function is (understandably) hogging the runtime:
function [preview,preview_a] = fcn(dp,X_matrix,rho_matrix)
%preallocate
rho_matrix_t = rho_matrix'
preview_a=zeros(1,185);
for i=1:dp
preview(i)=X+i;
preview_a(i)=interp1(X_matrix,rho_matrix_t,preview(i));
end
I understand the interp1 will inevitably consume some CPU time, but could there be some approach to improve the above code?
In the meantime I have these following in mind:
  1. Vectorization: building preview(1:dp) then do interp1 operation in batch (but I suspect interp1 doesn't support this)
  2. Using other built-in Simulink block that does equivalent jobs? (I've been looking at interp block, will see if it does the job).
Any suggestions are welcomed. :)
Regards,
Arya

Akzeptierte Antwort

Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson am 23 Aug. 2016
interp1() is fine with accepting a vector of points to interpolate at. Building preview ahead of time should work well.
  1 Kommentar
Arya
Arya am 24 Aug. 2016
Bearbeitet: Arya am 24 Aug. 2016
Indeed, it turns out interp1() is happy to accept vector points, this is what I did:
function [preview,preview_a] = fcn(dp,X_matrix,rho_matrix)
%preallocate
rho_matrix_t = rho_matrix'
preview_a=zeros(1,185);
i=1:dp
preview(i) = X+i
preview_a(i)=interp1(X_matrix,rho_matrix_t,preview(i));
Much simpler than I thought, and seem to accelerate the execution time a bit.
Cheers!

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Weitere Antworten (0)

Kategorien

Mehr zu Simulink finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by