Narx model GIVES POOR PERFORMANCE
4 Ansichten (letzte 30 Tage)
Ältere Kommentare anzeigen
I am trying to train a NN using NEWNARXSP. When I execute the following commands:
current={ [3.38] [3.37706] [3.37412] [3.37118] [3.36824] [3.3653] [3.36236] [3.35942] [3.35648] [3.35354] [3.3506] [3.34766] [3.34472] [3.34178] [3.33884] [3.3359] [3.33296] [3.33002] [3.32441] [3.32147] [3.32] [3.31804] [3.31706] [3.31559] [3.31412] [3.31118] [3.30922] [3.30771] [3.3053] [3.3] [3.29804] [3.29706] [3.29412] [3.29265] [3.29118] [3.2884] [3.28294] [3.28] [3.27608] [3.27412] [3.27118] [3.26824] [3.267505] [3.26677] [3.26660] [3.26660] [3.26660] [3.2702] [3.27412] [3.27559] [3.27608] [3.27706] [3.27853] [3.28] [3.28147] [3.28294] [3.28588] [3.2898] [3.29559] [3.3] [3.30294] [3.30588] [3.31265] [3.31559] [3.32] [3.3249] [3.32724] [3.33314] [3.33608] [3.34] [3.34294] [3.34735] [3.35078] [3.3547] [3.36] [3.36441] [3.36882] [3.37176] [3.37323] [3.37412] [3.37706] [3.38] [3.38294] [3.38]};
resistance={[6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.02] [6.04] [6.06] [6.10] [6.12] [6.14] [6.16] [6.18] [6.22] [6.24] [6.28] [6.31] [6.40] [6.44] [6.48] [6.52] [6.56] [6.60] [6.68] [6.78] [6.86] [7] [7.07] [7.23] [7.42] [7.5] [7.58] [7.66] [7.74] [7.9] [8] [8] [8] [7.9] [7.82] [7.74] [7.66] [7.58] [7.5] [7.43] [7.31] [7.16] [7.07] [7] [6.93] [6.83] [6.79] [7.72] [6.65] [6.60] [6.54] [6.5] [6.46] [6.42] [6.38] [6.34] [6.30] [6.26] [6.22] [6.18] [6.15] [6.14] [6.12] [6.11] [6.1] [6.06] [6.02]};
a=cell2mat(current);
b=cell2mat(resistance);
d1=[1 2];
d2=[1 2];
sus=newnarxsp({[3.26660 3.38],[6.02 8]},d1,d2,[5 1],{'tansig','purelin'});
p=[a;b];
T=b;
sus.trainFcn='trainlm';
sus.trainparam.show=100;
sus.trainparam.epochs=1000;
sus=train(sus,p,T);
IT GIVES POOR PERFORMANCE. Actually I want to measure the value of resistance by using the current. here current is input and resistance is target . what can i do now?
1 Kommentar
Walter Roberson
am 18 Jan. 2012
Note: all those [] are unnecessary. Especially as you cell2mat() anyhow, suggesting that you would be better off writing
current = [3.38 3.3776 3,37412 <etc>];
Antworten (0)
Siehe auch
Kategorien
Mehr zu Deep Learning Toolbox finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!