Filter löschen
Filter löschen

Why GPU performance is worse than CPU for this code?

2 Ansichten (letzte 30 Tage)
King Fisher
King Fisher am 27 Nov. 2011
clear all
close all
tic
t=9999;
X = rand( t, 'single' );
G = gpuArray( X );
isequal( gather( G ), X ) % returns true
classUnderlying( G ) % returns 'single'
G2 = G .* G
toc
tic
X = rand( t, 'single' );
G1 = X;
G3 = G1 .* G1 ;
toc
The execution time of GPU is less than CPu i5. Would anybody answer it?
  1 Kommentar
Jan
Jan am 27 Nov. 2011
About "clear all" see: http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/16484-good-programming-practice#answer_22301
Please decide, if the "GPU performance is worse than CPU", or if "the execution time of GPU is less than CPU".

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Akzeptierte Antwort

Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson am 27 Nov. 2011
There is a lot of overhead for sending data to a GPU. It is only faster for sufficiently big matrices.
Also, in the first one you are including the "isequal" and the "classUnderlying" in the timing, neither of which is needed for the computation. It is not fair to time different sets of activities.

Weitere Antworten (2)

Jan
Jan am 27 Nov. 2011
Please try this:
X = rand(1e3, 1e3, 'single' );
G = gpuArray( X );
G2 = G;
tic
for i = 1:100
G2 = G2 .* G;
end
toc
tic
G = X;
G2 = X;
for i = 1:100
G2 = G2 .* G;
end
toc

cdarling
cdarling am 19 Feb. 2012
there is a possibility that your GPU supports parallel.gpu.GPUArray.rand(), and it would be much faster if you construct random numbers within GPU, instead of generate and copy them into GPU

Kategorien

Mehr zu GPU Computing finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by