How to optimize YOLOv11 implementation in MATLAB that is significantly slower than its PyTorch counterpart?
28 Ansichten (letzte 30 Tage)
Ältere Kommentare anzeigen
I've implemented YOLOv11 in MATLAB with Deep Learning Toolbox, but I'm experiencing significant performance issues compared to the PyTorch implementation. The MATLAB version is running much slower during training despite having the same architecture (296 layers with 425 connections).
Environment:
- MATLAB Version: R2024b
- GPU: NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti 24GB
- CUDA Version: 11.7
- Operating System: Windows 10
Problem Description:
- I've created a full implementation of YOLOv11 in MATLAB by adapting the network architecture from the original PyTorch model
- Using identical batch size and training parameters on the same hardware, the MATLAB implementation is significantly slower - training takes several times longer per epoch compared to the PyTorch version (approximately 5-8x slower)
- I suspect bottlenecks might be in my custom layer implementations, particularly in reshape and transpose operations
Code Examples: I've implemented several custom layers to handle operations that don't have direct equivalents in MATLAB, for example:
matlab
classdef ReshapeTransposeLayer < nnet.layer.Layer
methods
function layer = ReshapeTransposeLayer(name)
layer.Name = name;
layer.Description = 'Reshape and Transpose layer for YOLO';
layer.NumInputs = 3;
layer.NumOutputs = 3;
layer.InputNames = {'in1', 'in2', 'in3'};
layer.OutputNames = {'x_model_23_dfl_Trans', 'x_model_23_Sigmoid_o', 'x_model_23_Sigmoid_oNumDims'};
end
function [x_model_23_dfl_Trans, x_model_23_Sigmoid_o, x_model_23_Sigmoid_oNumDims] = predict(layer, X1, X2, X3)
try
% Calculate grid sizes
grid_size_1 = 80 * 80; % 6400
grid_size_2 = 40 * 40; % 1600
grid_size_3 = 20 * 20; % 400
total_grid_size = grid_size_1 + grid_size_2 + grid_size_3; % 8400
% Process X1 (80x80 grid)
x1_data = extractdata(X1);
% Get batch size
batchSize = size(x1_data, ndims(x1_data));
if ndims(x1_data) < 4
batchSize = 1;
end
% Process each batch
dfl_final_all = [];
cls_preds_all = [];
for b = 1:batchSize
% [More processing code with reshape operations]
end
catch e
fprintf('Error in ReshapeTransposeLayer: %s\n', e.message);
rethrow(e);
end
end
end
end
Specific Questions:
- How can I efficiently profile and identify performance bottlenecks in my MATLAB deep learning model?
- Are there more efficient ways to implement complex reshape and transpose operations for YOLO-type models in MATLAB?
- What strategies could help reduce the performance gap between MATLAB and PyTorch implementations?
- Is there a recommended approach for batch processing in custom layers that avoids explicit loops?
0 Kommentare
Antworten (1)
Yair Altman
am 17 Mär. 2025
There are numerous ways to speedup Matlab code, and your general question is too vague for specific fixes. The best recommendation is to run the built-in Matlab Profiler tool ("Run & Time" in the Editor, or the profile command in the console) to identify the specific bottelenecks in your code. Once you identify the main bottlenecks, resolve them, rerun the code to ensure that it's still valid/correct, and then repeat the profiling cycle until you're satisfied.
Siehe auch
Kategorien
Mehr zu Parallel and Cloud finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!