Vectorize an anonymous function

4 Ansichten (letzte 30 Tage)
AES
AES am 11 Aug. 2022
Kommentiert: Matt J am 11 Aug. 2022
I was wondering whether someone would be able to help/point me in the right direction for vectorizing a anonymous function?
I am trying to fit a multivariate gaussian distribution to data. Here is my code:
for n = 1:length(uniqPosOne)
gaussElpt = @(param) (param(1) + param(2).*(exp(-1/2 .* (uniqPosOne(n, :) - [param(3), param(4)]) * ...
([param(5), param(6); param(6), param(7)]).^(-1) * (uniqPosOne(n, :) - [param(3), param(4)]).')));
a = gaussElpt(startPoint);
tempList(n) = a;
end
I am trying to optimize the parameters that allow for me to fit my data (not shown), I use lsqnonlin.
uniqPosOne is a n x 2 array, params(1) and (2) are offset/gain, params(3) and (4) are vector means, and params(5), (6), (7) are part of covaraince matrix. The params are the parameters used by lsqnonlin to find the parameters with the lowest error.
I want to be able to have a nx2 array (uniqPosOne) and have the function evaluate each pair separately in a vectorized manner, currently I have been unable to do so as attempting vectorization results in a nxn, while I want a nx1.
The main reason is due to time to compute is rather long for a small subset of data. Any help is appreciated.
  3 Kommentare
AES
AES am 11 Aug. 2022
Thank you!
Walter Roberson
Walter Roberson am 11 Aug. 2022
Or, better yet,
[param(5), param(6); param(6), param(7)] \ (uniqPosOne(n, :) - [param(3), param(4)]).'

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Akzeptierte Antwort

Matt J
Matt J am 11 Aug. 2022
Just replace all the uniqPosOne(n,:) with uniqPosOne:
gaussElpt = @(param) (param(1) + param(2).*(exp(-1/2 .* (uniqPosOne - [param(3), param(4)]) * ...
([param(5), param(6); param(6), param(7)]).^(-1) * (uniqPosOne - [param(3), param(4)]).')));
  5 Kommentare
AES
AES am 11 Aug. 2022
Thank you, this is what I was looking to do. If you have time could you breifly explain, or point me towards some resources that may explain, this operation: sum((Sigma\dev).*dev)?
Matt J
Matt J am 11 Aug. 2022
Sigma\dev is the more recommended way of doing inv(Sigma)*dev.
See also Walter's comment above.

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Weitere Antworten (1)

Matt J
Matt J am 11 Aug. 2022
Bearbeitet: Matt J am 11 Aug. 2022
This FEX submission already appears to do what you want,

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by