Reimann sum and numerical integration

31 Ansichten (letzte 30 Tage)
DM
DM am 25 Jan. 2015
Kommentiert: Star Strider am 25 Jan. 2015
I am trying to solve the functions below numerically using MATLAB
This is my code where I have used "integral" command to solve for the second integral, while I used Reimann sum to solve for the first. Take for example c=1/128.
x= -1/128:0.0001:1/128;
for j=1:length(x)
den= @(y) pi^2.* sqrt(1- (x(j)+y).^2) .* sqrt(1- y.^2);
fun= @(y) 1./den(y);
ymin= max(-0.999,-0.999-x(j));
ymax= min(0.999,0.999-x(j));
pdfX(j)=integral(fun,ymin,ymax);
end
sum1=0;
for j=1:length(omegat)
func1(j)=pdfX(j)*0.0001;
sum1=sum1+func1(j);
end
F=sum1;
Do you think it is correct? Are there any other ways to make it more accurate?
Thanks

Akzeptierte Antwort

Star Strider
Star Strider am 25 Jan. 2015
I would likely use either trapz or cumtrapz to calculate ‘F’, but otherwise I see no problems.
  3 Kommentare
DM
DM am 25 Jan. 2015
Also did you notice I have 0.999 instead of 1, so as to avoid the singularity point, is that OK ?
Star Strider
Star Strider am 25 Jan. 2015
Personal preference, really. The trapz function is designed for numerical integration:
F = trapz(x, pdfX)
Avoiding the singularity is likely a good move. I doubt that substituting -0.999 would produce significant error. You might want to experiment with (1-1E-8) instead if you are curious.

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Weitere Antworten (0)

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by