Nested for-Loops in parfor
3 Ansichten (letzte 30 Tage)
Ältere Kommentare anzeigen
I try to put a for-loop in a parfor-loop. However, the following code is invalid.
parfor i=1:10
for j=1:10
a(j)=1;
end
end
The only way I know to fix that is
parfor i=1:10
for j=1:10
a(i,j)=1;
end
end
But I think it is inefficient when the size of "a" is large (I don't need "a" at the end of this program) . Is there a better way to implement this nested for-loop?
1 Kommentar
Edric Ellis
am 23 Mär. 2022
@Walter Roberson has provided you with a way to fix the problem. Just to explain the problem a little bit more - parfor insists on being able to prove that the iterations of your parfor loop are not (trying to be) order-dependent. In your original code, it appears as though the value of a as assigned when i==1 is still available on the next iteration when i==2. Walter's fix assigns a value to the whole of a, and this makes parfor satisfied that you cannot possibly access the old values of a in subsequent iterations.
Akzeptierte Antwort
Weitere Antworten (0)
Siehe auch
Kategorien
Mehr zu Parallel for-Loops (parfor) finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!