I need a starting point for choosing "spread" when using newrb()

1 Ansicht (letzte 30 Tage)
Shadan
Shadan am 24 Apr. 2014
Kommentiert: Shadan am 29 Apr. 2014
My data sets consist of 62 inputs and one output and I want to do function approximation. I understand that the optimum "spread" value is usually determined by trial and error. However, I was wondering if there is any way of approximating this value ( just to get a sense of its greatness )? My second question is regarding the minimum number of training samples required when using newrb. Is it just like the feedforward neural networks, the more the better?
Thank you for your support

Akzeptierte Antwort

Greg Heath
Greg Heath am 28 Apr. 2014
Bearbeitet: Greg Heath am 28 Apr. 2014
If you standardize inputs (zscore or mapstd) the unity default is a good starting place.
The best generalization performance comes from using as few hidden neurons as possible.
Search the neural net literature (e.g., comp.ai.neural-nets FAQ) using the terms
overfitting
overtraining

Weitere Antworten (0)

Kategorien

Mehr zu Deep Learning Toolbox finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by