Mesh size largly differes in 'parabolic' and 'pdenonlin' functions to give a solution.
2 Ansichten (letzte 30 Tage)
Ältere Kommentare anzeigen
Hi,
I'm going to solve an elliptic PDE where the gradient of solution is extremely large in a specific portion of the domain. 'pdenonlin' demands a really fine mesh size around this region and consequently large amount of memory. but when I choose to solve its parabolic PDE version and increase the time large enough to get a steady-state solution, it works fine with larger mesh sizes. So I want to know is this an intrinsic property of these two functions or I'm missing some thing here?
thanks,
Antworten (0)
Siehe auch
Kategorien
Mehr zu Geometry and Mesh finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!