Abnormal outputs in Neural Networks Blind tests (new tests after the net is trained).
2 Ansichten (letzte 30 Tage)
Ältere Kommentare anzeigen
mmenvo
am 23 Feb. 2014
Bearbeitet: Greg Heath
am 26 Feb. 2014
The data divisions in my ANN model is trn 60 - val 20 - tst 20 . All of my input and target values are in between 0 - 1 (numeric values). The problem that i am facing with is >> when the network is trained, i insert new data set (five new input variables but samples number are 35) to estimate the output variable, as it was already trained with the target variable. Unfortunately the output becomes exactly same for all the 35 samples. It must not happen, there is something wrong that i might have done. Could you please light some shed on these. I am using Matlab R2012b version. Matlab codes are given as follows:
Inp_var1 = xlsread('Training data.xlsx','B2:B165241');
Inp_var2 = xlsread('Training data.xlsx','D2:D165241');
Inp_var3 = xlsread('Training data.xlsx','C2:C165241');
Inp_var4 = xlsread('Training data.xlsx','E2:E165241');
Inp_var5 = xlsread('Training data.xlsx','F2:F165241');
Tar_var1 = xlsread('Training data.xlsx','K2:K165241');
Input(1,:) = Inp_var1;
Input(2,:) = Inp_var2;
Input(3,:) = Inp_var3;
Input(4,:) = Inp_var4;
Input(5,:) = Inp_var5;
Target(1,:) = Tar_var1;
net = feedforwardnet;
net = configure(net,Input,Target);
net.layers{1}.transferFcn = 'tansig';
net.layers{1}.initFcn = 'initnw';
net.layers{2}.transferFcn = 'purelin';
net.layers{2}.initFcn = 'initnw';
net = init(net);
net.IW{1,1}
net.b{1}
net.adaptFcn = 'adaptwb';
net.inputWeights{1,1}.learnFcn = 'learnp';
net.biases{1}.learnFcn = 'learnp';
inputs = Input;
targets = Target;
hiddenLayerSize = 3; % number of hidden neurons
net = fitnet(hiddenLayerSize);
net.inputs{1}.processFcns = {'removeconstantrows','mapminmax','mapstd'};
net.outputs{2}.processFcns = {'removeconstantrows','mapminmax','mapstd'};
net.divideFcn = 'dividerand';
net.divideMode = 'sample';
net.divideParam.trainRatio = 60/100;
net.divideParam.valRatio = 20/100;
net.divideParam.testRatio = 20/100;
net.trainFcn = 'trainlm';
net.performFcn = 'mse';
net.plotFcns = {'plotperform','plottrainstate','ploterrhist', ...
'plotregression', 'plotfit'};
net.efficiency.memoryReduction = 1;
[net,tr] = train(net,inputs,targets);
outputs = net(inputs);
errors = gsubtract(targets,outputs);
performance = perform(net,targets,outputs);
trainTargets = targets .* tr.trainMask{1};
valTargets = targets .* tr.valMask{1};
testTargets = targets .* tr.testMask{1};
trainPerformance = perform(net,trainTargets,outputs)
valPerformance = perform(net,valTargets,outputs)
testPerformance = perform(net,testTargets,outputs)
net.trainParam.epochs;
net.trainParam.time;
net.trainParam.goal;
net.trainParam.min_grad;
net.trainParam.mu_max;
net.trainParam.max_fail;
net.trainParam.show;
end
0 Kommentare
Akzeptierte Antwort
Greg Heath
am 24 Feb. 2014
Most of your code is useless. It is equivalent to
Input(1,:) = xlsread('Training data.xlsx','B2:B165241');
Input(2,:) = xlsread('Training data.xlsx','D2:D165241');
Input(3,:) = xlsread('Training data.xlsx','C2:C165241');
Input(4,:) = xlsread('Training data.xlsx','E2:E165241');
Input(5,:) = xlsread('Training data.xlsx','F2:F165241');
Target(1,:) = xlsread('Training data.xlsx','K2:K165241');
hiddenLayerSize = 3; % number of hidden neurons
net = fitnet(hiddenLayerSize);
net.inputs{1}.processFcns = {'removeconstantrows','mapminmax','mapstd'};
net.outputs{2}.processFcns = {'removeconstantrows','mapminmax','mapstd'};
net.divideParam.trainRatio = 60/100;
net.divideParam.valRatio = 20/100;
net.divideParam.testRatio = 20/100;
[net,tr] = train(net,inputs,targets);
outputs = net(inputs);
errors = gsubtract(targets,outputs);
performance = perform(net,targets,outputs);
trainTargets = targets .* tr.trainMask{1};
valTargets = targets .* tr.valMask{1};
testTargets = targets .* tr.testMask{1};
trainPerformance = perform(net,trainTargets,outputs)
valPerformance = perform(net,valTargets,outputs)
testPerformance = perform(net,testTargets,outputs)
Make sure the input summary statistics (mean/covariance-matrix) for the original and new data are close enough to be assumed to be drawn from the same probability distribution.
Thank you for formally accepting my answer
Greg
6 Kommentare
Greg Heath
am 26 Feb. 2014
Bearbeitet: Greg Heath
am 26 Feb. 2014
With N this large you do not need val and test
net.divide.Fcn = 'dividetrain'; %100/0/0
and try to minimize H, the number of hidden nodes.
Hope this helps.
Weitere Antworten (0)
Siehe auch
Kategorien
Mehr zu Define Shallow Neural Network Architectures finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!