parallelization and mex-compiled code
1 Ansicht (letzte 30 Tage)
Ältere Kommentare anzeigen
I want to optimize a mex-compiled function (fortran-90 source) defined over an 1D interval by computing its values on a sufficiently fine sampling. It works fine with a for-loop but when I try parfor (for speed) I get crashes in the mex-compiled code (getting a error from one of the workers). Is this a documented problem, and does anyone have suggestions how to localize what goes wrong?
I run MatlabR2013a and Ubuntu 13.10 on a 16 core (32 virtual) machine and I get 12 workers when I do matlabpool.
1 Kommentar
Matt J
am 6 Feb. 2014
No, there is no general prohibition against using mex files with parfor. Show us the plain for-loop and the parfor version.
Akzeptierte Antwort
Matt J
am 6 Feb. 2014
Bearbeitet: Matt J
am 6 Feb. 2014
You should try running a plain for-loop first, but with the iterations in random order, i.e., instead of
for i=1:n
...
end
run as
for i=randperm(n)
...
end
This is a good way to test whether your code is independent of the order of the iterations (a basic requirement of parfor) before the Parallel Computing Toolbox even gets involved.
5 Kommentare
Matt J
am 6 Feb. 2014
Can you try it on a different machine to see if it's hardware problem? I don't see anything wrong with the code.
Weitere Antworten (0)
Siehe auch
Kategorien
Mehr zu Parallel Computing Fundamentals finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!