copy-on-write, performance, and code readability

7 Ansichten (letzte 30 Tage)
matal
matal am 26 Nov. 2013
Beantwortet: The Matlab Spot am 26 Nov. 2013
I use a global, multi-level nested struct() to hold a lot of data. For example, I have:
global DATA;
DATA.US.AAPL.date = <array of dates>
DATA.US.AAPL.px = <array of prices>
Exactly why I am using a structure like this or what I am storing in it is not relevant for this question. Above is just an example.
Inside of functions that operate on this structure, I often create an "alias":
function m = doStuff(region,ticker)
global DATA;
ldata = DATA.(region).(ticker);
<work on and possibly update ldata>
DATA.(region).(ticker) = ldata;
end
It's obvious that using an alias like ldata improves readability - however this appears to come at a cost. When DATA is large, replace ldata with direct DATA.(region).(ticker) leads to material performance improvement.
Presumably, the Matlab copy-on-write semantics is somehow to blame here.
Any thoughts as to how I can get readability and performance?

Antworten (2)

Muneef
Muneef am 26 Nov. 2013
so are you using struct. inside a function?
  1 Kommentar
matal
matal am 26 Nov. 2013
yes - is the code sample unclear somehow? let me know.

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.


The Matlab Spot
The Matlab Spot am 26 Nov. 2013

Kategorien

Mehr zu Data Type Conversion finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange

Produkte

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by