Bug in single/double operations?
7 Ansichten (letzte 30 Tage)
Ältere Kommentare anzeigen
Can anybody explain this behaviour?
If you run the following code, it behaves as expected. You finish up with approximately eps('single')=1e-7.
HOWEVER, if you comment out the disp(x) line, then you finish up with eps('double')=1e-16.
Why should a disp(x) change anything? Is it a sneaky invisible casting?
------------------------------------
format long
x = single(1) % single precision
while single(1+x) > 1 % keep going until no difference
x= x/2; % if you can tell any difference, half it.
disp(x) % comment this line out
end % while
---------------------------------------
1 Kommentar
Akzeptierte Antwort
James Tursa
am 28 Jun. 2011
This exact issue has already been discussed on the newsgroup, with the JIT being the likely cause of the difference:
0 Kommentare
Weitere Antworten (1)
Mike Hosea
am 27 Jun. 2011
It appears to be something to do with the MATLAB JIT-Accelerator. I'm going to say it's probably unintentional. :)
I have to add, however, that while one can usually get away with an algorithm like that in MATLAB (except for code generation), we had to give up on it in numerical software in general after Intel came out with 80-bit extended-precision floating-point registers. Usually you want the eps for the data type, not for the register.
0 Kommentare
Siehe auch
Kategorien
Mehr zu Creating and Concatenating Matrices finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange
Community Treasure Hunt
Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!
Start Hunting!