Bug in single/double operations?

7 Ansichten (letzte 30 Tage)
David Wilson
David Wilson am 27 Jun. 2011
Can anybody explain this behaviour?
If you run the following code, it behaves as expected. You finish up with approximately eps('single')=1e-7.
HOWEVER, if you comment out the disp(x) line, then you finish up with eps('double')=1e-16.
Why should a disp(x) change anything? Is it a sneaky invisible casting?
------------------------------------
format long
x = single(1) % single precision
while single(1+x) > 1 % keep going until no difference
x= x/2; % if you can tell any difference, half it.
disp(x) % comment this line out
end % while
---------------------------------------
  1 Kommentar
Paulo Silva
Paulo Silva am 27 Jun. 2011
weird behavior, I have no idea why that happens

Melden Sie sich an, um zu kommentieren.

Akzeptierte Antwort

James Tursa
James Tursa am 28 Jun. 2011
This exact issue has already been discussed on the newsgroup, with the JIT being the likely cause of the difference:

Weitere Antworten (1)

Mike Hosea
Mike Hosea am 27 Jun. 2011
It appears to be something to do with the MATLAB JIT-Accelerator. I'm going to say it's probably unintentional. :)
I have to add, however, that while one can usually get away with an algorithm like that in MATLAB (except for code generation), we had to give up on it in numerical software in general after Intel came out with 80-bit extended-precision floating-point registers. Usually you want the eps for the data type, not for the register.

Kategorien

Mehr zu Creating and Concatenating Matrices finden Sie in Help Center und File Exchange

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by