Accelerate Code Using fiaccel
Speeding Up Fixed-Point Execution with fiaccel
You can convert fixed-point MATLAB® code to MEX functions using fiaccel. The generated MEX functions contain optimizations to automatically
accelerate fixed-point algorithms to compiled C/C++ code speed in MATLAB. The fiaccel function can greatly increase the execution
speed of your algorithms.
Running fiaccel
The basic command is:
fiaccel M_fcn
By default, fiaccel performs the following actions:
Searches for the function
M_fcnstored in the fileM_fcn.mas specified in Compile Path Search Order.Compiles
M_fcnto MEX code.If there are no errors or warnings, generates a platform-specific MEX file in the current folder, using the naming conventions described in File Naming Conventions.
If there are errors, does not generate a MEX file, but produces an error report in a default output folder, as described in Generated Files and Locations.
If there are warnings, but no errors, generates a platform-specific MEX file in the current folder, but does report the warnings.
You can modify this default behavior by specifying one or more compiler options with
fiaccel, separated by spaces on the
command line.
Generated Files and Locations
fiaccel generates files in the following locations:
| Generates: | In: |
|---|---|
Platform-specific MEX files | Current folder |
code generation reports (if errors or warnings occur during compilation) | Default output folder: fiaccel/mex/M_fcn_name/html |
You can change the name and location of generated files by using the options
-o and -d when you run fiaccel.
In this example, you will use the fiaccel function to compile
different parts of a simple algorithm. By comparing the run times of the two cases, you will
see the benefits and best use of the fiaccel function.
Compare Run Times When Accelerating Different Algorithm Parts
This example shows how to use the fiaccel function to compile different parts of a simple algorithm.
The algorithm used throughout this example replicates the functionality of the MATLAB sum function, which sums the columns of a matrix.
type fi_matrix_column_sum.mfunction B = fi_matrix_column_sum(A)
% Sum the columns of matrix A.
% Copyright 2008-2023 The MathWorks, Inc.
%#codegen
[m,n] = size(A);
w = get(A,'WordLength') + ceil(log2(m));
f = get(A,'FractionLength');
B = fi(zeros(1,n),true,w,f,fimath(A));
for j = 1:n
for i = 1:m
B(j) = B(j) + A(i,j);
end
end
Trial 1: Best Performance
The best way to speed up the execution of the algorithm is to compile the entire algorithm using the fiaccel function. To evaluate the performance improvement provided by the fiaccel function when the entire algorithm is compiled, run the following code.
The first portion of code executes the algorithm using only MATLAB functions.
fipref('NumericTypeDisplay','short'); A = fi(randn(1000,10)); tic B = fi_matrix_column_sum(A); t_matrix_column_sum_m = toc
t_matrix_column_sum_m = 1.5877
The second portion of the code compiles the entire algorithm using the fiaccel function. The MATLAB tic and toc functions keep track of the run times for each method of execution.
fiaccel fi_matrix_column_sum -args {A} tic B = fi_matrix_column_sum_mex(A); t_matrix_column_sum_mex = toc
t_matrix_column_sum_mex = 0.1211
Trial 2: Worst Performance
Compiling only the smallest unit of computation using the fiaccel function leads to much slower execution. In some cases, the overhead that results from calling the mex function inside a nested loop can cause even slower execution than using MATLAB functions alone. To evaluate the performance of the mex function when only the smallest unit of computation is compiled, run the following code.
The first portion of code executes the algorithm using only MATLAB functions.
tic [m,n] = size(A); w = get(A,'WordLength') + ceil(log2(m)); f = get(A,'FractionLength'); B = fi(zeros(1,n),true,w,f); for j = 1:n for i = 1:m B(j) = fi_scalar_sum(B(j),A(i,j)); % B(j) = B(j) + A(i,j); end end t_scalar_sum_m = toc
t_scalar_sum_m = 3.3595
The second portion of the code compiles the smallest unit of computation with the fiaccel function, leaving the rest of the computations to MATLAB.
fiaccel fi_scalar_sum -args {B(1),A(1,1)} tic [m,n] = size(A); w = get(A,'WordLength') + ceil(log2(m)); f = get(A,'FractionLength'); B = fi(zeros(1,n),true,w,f); for j = 1:n for i = 1:m B(j) = fi_scalar_sum_mex(B(j),A(i,j)); % B(j) = B(j) + A(i,j); end end t_scalar_sum_mex = toc
t_scalar_sum_mex = 2.7475
Ratio of Times
Compare the results of Trial 1 and Trial 2. Your computer may record different times, but the ratios should be approximately the same. There is a significant difference in ratios between the trial where the entire algorithm was compiled using fiaccel (t_matrix_column_sum_mex.m) and where only the scalar sum was compiled (t_scalar_sum_mex.m). Even the file with no fiaccel compilation (t_matrix_column_sum_m) did better than when only the smallest unit of computation was compiled using fiaccel (t_scalar_sum_mex).
t_scalar_sum_mex/t_matrix_column_sum_mex
ans = 22.6896
t_scalar_sum_mex/t_matrix_column_sum_m
ans = 1.7305
t_matrix_column_sum_m/t_matrix_column_sum_mex
ans = 13.1119
t_scalar_sum_m/t_scalar_sum_mex
ans = 1.2228
Trial 1: Best Performance
The best way to speed up the execution of the algorithm is to compile the entire
algorithm using the fiaccel function. To evaluate the performance
improvement provided by the fiaccel function when the entire algorithm
is compiled, run the following code.
The first portion of code executes the algorithm using only MATLAB functions. The second portion of the code compiles the entire algorithm
using the fiaccel function. The MATLAB
tic and toc functions keep track of the run times
for each method of execution.
% MATLAB
fipref('NumericTypeDisplay','short');
A = fi(randn(1000,10));
tic
B = fi_matrix_column_sum(A)
t_matrix_column_sum_m = toc
% fiaccel
fiaccel fi_matrix_column_sum -args {A}
tic
B = fi_matrix_column_sum_mex(A);
t_matrix_column_sum_mex = tocTrial 2: Worst Performance
Compiling only the smallest unit of computation using the fiaccel
function leads to much slower execution. In some cases, the overhead that results from
calling the mex function inside a nested loop can cause even slower
execution than using MATLAB functions alone. To evaluate the performance of the mex
function when only the smallest unit of computation is compiled, run the following code.
The first portion of code executes the algorithm using only MATLAB functions. The second portion of the code compiles the smallest unit of
computation with the fiaccel function, leaving the rest of the
computations to MATLAB.
% MATLAB
tic
[m,n] = size(A);
w = get(A,'WordLength') + ceil(log2(m));
f = get(A,'FractionLength');
B = fi(zeros(1,n),true,w,f);
for j = 1:n
for i = 1:m
B(j) = fi_scalar_sum(B(j),A(i,j));
% B(j) = B(j) + A(i,j);
end
end
t_scalar_sum_m = toc
% fiaccel
fiaccel fi_scalar_sum -args {B(1),A(1,1)}
tic
[m,n] = size(A);
w = get(A,'WordLength') + ceil(log2(m));
f = get(A,'FractionLength');
B = fi(zeros(1,n),true,w,f);
for j = 1:n
for i = 1:m
B(j) = fi_scalar_sum_mex(B(j),A(i,j));
% B(j) = B(j) + A(i,j);
end
end
t_scalar_sum_mex = tocRatio of Times
A comparison of Trial 1 and Trial 2 appears in the following table. Your computer may
record different times than the ones the table shows, but the ratios should be
approximately the same. There is an extreme difference in ratios between the trial where
the entire algorithm was compiled using fiaccel
(t_matrix_column_sum_mex.m) and where only the scalar sum was
compiled (t_scalar_sum_mex.m). Even the file with no
fiaccel compilation (t_matrix_column_sum_m) did
better than when only the smallest unit of computation was compiled using
fiaccel (t_scalar_sum_mex).
| X (Overall Performance Rank) | Time | X/Best | X_m/X_mex |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trial 1: Best Performance | |||
t_matrix_column_sum_m (2) | 1.99759 | 84.4917 | 84.4917 |
t_matrix_column_sum_mex (1) | 0.0236424 | 1 | |
| Trial 2: Worst Performance | |||
t_scalar_sum_m (4) | 10.2067 | 431.71 | 2.08017 |
t_scalar_sum_mex (3) | 4.90664 | 207.536 | |
Data Type Override Using fiaccel
To
turn data type override on, type the following command at the MATLAB prompt after running the reset(fipref)
command:
fipref('DataTypeOverride','TrueDoubles')
This command tells Fixed-Point Designer™ software to create all fi objects with type
fi
double. When you compile the code using the fiaccel
command,
the resulting MEX-function uses floating-point data.
Specifying Default fimath Values for MEX Functions
MEX functions generated with fiaccel use the MATLAB default global fimath. The MATLAB factory default global fimath has the following properties:
RoundingMethod: Nearest OverflowAction: Saturate ProductMode: FullPrecision SumMode: FullPrecision
When running MEX functions that depend on the MATLAB default fimath value, do not change this value during your
MATLAB session. Otherwise, MATLAB generates a warning, alerting you to a mismatch between the compile-time and
run-time fimath values. For example, create the following MATLAB function:
function y = test %#codegen y = fi(0);
test constructs a fi object without
explicitly specifying a fimath object. Therefore, test
relies on the default fimath object in effect at compile time. Generate the MEX function test_mex to use the factory setting of the
MATLAB default
fimath.
resetglobalfimath;
fiaccel test
fiaccel
generates a MEX function, test_mex, in the current folder.Run
test_mex.
test_mex
ans =
0
DataTypeMode: Fixed-point: binary point scaling
Signedness: Signed
WordLength: 16
FractionLength: 15 Modify the MATLAB default fimath value so it no longer matches the setting
used at compile time.
F = fimath('RoundingMethod','Floor'); globalfimath(F);
Clear the MEX function from memory and rerun it.
clear test_mex
test_mextestglobalfimath_mex
Warning: This function was generated with a
different default fimath than the current default.
ans =
0
DataTypeMode: Fixed-point: binary point scaling
Signedness: Signed
WordLength: 16
FractionLength: 15fimath properties from your algorithm by
using types tables. For more information, see Separate Data Type Definitions from Algorithm.