Bing
Waterloo
Aktiv seit 2012
Followers: 0 Following: 0
Statistik
RANG
115.404
of 301.213
REPUTATION
0
ANTWORTZUSTIMMUNG
0.0%
ERHALTENE STIMMEN
0
RANG
of 21.191
REPUTATION
N/A
DURCHSCHNITTLICHE BEWERTUNG
0.00
BEITRÄGE
0 Dateien
DOWNLOADS
0
ALL TIME DOWNLOADS
0
RANG
of 173.422
BEITRÄGE
0 Probleme
0 Lösungen
PUNKTESTAND
0
ANZAHL DER ABZEICHEN
0
BEITRÄGE
0 Beiträge
BEITRÄGE
0 Öffentlich Kanäle
DURCHSCHNITTLICHE BEWERTUNG
BEITRÄGE
0 Discussions
DURCHSCHNITTLICHE ANZAHL DER LIKES
Feeds
Beantwortet
why I obtained different result from NN sim and manual calculation using the weights
your anweer to input=15 is right. I also test input=-15. maunally, I got 6.604 but sim generate -36.6091 >> temp=(IW{1}*0+b...
why I obtained different result from NN sim and manual calculation using the weights
your anweer to input=15 is right. I also test input=-15. maunally, I got 6.604 but sim generate -36.6091 >> temp=(IW{1}*0+b...
fast 14 Jahre vor | 0
Beantwortet
why I obtained different result from NN sim and manual calculation using the weights
Thanks for the answer. But the "a" of purelin function in matlab is 1. This is what I got from matlab >> purelin((purel...
why I obtained different result from NN sim and manual calculation using the weights
Thanks for the answer. But the "a" of purelin function in matlab is 1. This is what I got from matlab >> purelin((purel...
fast 14 Jahre vor | 0
Frage
why I obtained different result from NN sim and manual calculation using the weights
I use newff generate a very simple neural network with one input layer, one hidden layer (just one neuron for easy manual calcul...
fast 14 Jahre vor | 4 Antworten | 0
