How My 70,000-Character Game Fit into 10,000 Characters
I started my game for this contest, Stack OverDad, one month before the contest began. Dad tells programming jokes at the dinner table, and you have to laugh at the right moment. I was very happy with it. It had a dog, a little brother with a spoon, a window with a sun that goes down, fifty jokes, and many small animations.
Then the contest started, and I read the rules again. One line said: each entry is limited to 10,000 characters of MATLAB code.
My code had more than 70,000 characters.
So, as you can guess, the next hourse were cut, test, cut, test, cut... In this post, I will tell you what I learned on the way (from my AI friend!). Some of it surprised me.
Step 1: Cut What the Player Does Not Feel
For every part of the game, I asked: "Does the player really feel this?"
The dog: cute, but no. The brother: funny, but no. The sunset: nobody looks at the window when Dad tells a joke. Forty jokes: a game only uses ten anyway.
This was the biggest step, and the hardest, because I liked all of these things. But the game did not get worse. It got clearer. After this, my file had about 9,800 characters. I was done!
Step 2: The Surprise
The contest project has a command to check the game before you submit it:
minihackContest.validate
I ran it, and it said:
Validation failed: game.m exceeds the character limit (16145 / 10000, comments excluded).
16,145? My file had 9,800 characters. I counted again. It still had 9,800.
So I opened the validator to see how it counts. This is the line:
charCount = strlength(char(tree2str(mtree(gameFile, '-file'))));
mtree reads the code into a tree, and this removes the comments. Then tree2str writes the code again, in a clean, standard layout. The validator counts that text, not my file.
And the clean layout is not short at all. For example, this one line of mine:
if p,pr(s.T);end
comes back from tree2str like this:
if p
pr( s.T );
end
Every statement gets its own line. Every line gets indentation. Every f(a,b) becomes f( a, b ), and every [1 2 3] becomes [ 1, 2, 3 ]. My short style was not short anymore.
The good news: now I knew the real rule, so I could play by it.
Step 3: What Is Cheap and What Is Expensive
- Expensive: many statements, deep nesting, and long lists of numbers.
- Cheap: text inside a string. tree2str does not change a string at all.
So the plan was: fewer statements, less nesting, and move numbers into strings.
Example 1: Many Values in One Statement
s.st = 3;
s.t0 = t;
s.la = -1;
becomes one statement with deal:
[s.st, s.t0, s.la] = deal(3, t, -1);
Example 2: A Small if Without if
if n == 1
s.fl = "TEN?!";
end
With logical indexing, it is one line. If the condition is false, nothing changes:
s.fl(n == 1) = "TEN?!";
Example 3: Many Strings in One String
A list like ["PERFECT!", "GOOD!", "TOO LATE..."] pays for every ", ". One string with a separator is cheaper:
B = split("PERFECT!|GOOD!|TOO LATE...", "|");
All fifteen jokes are now one string too.
Example 4: Numbers Inside a String
This was the biggest trick. My scene (the table, the chairs, Dad, the family) is made of rectangles, ellipses, and polygons. That is hundreds of numbers.
So I stored each number as one character in a string. A character is really a number (its code), so I can turn it back:
v = double(char(z))/20 - 1025; % every character of z becomes one number again
I chose codes from a big block of normal, printable characters. They look like Chinese characters, but they are not words. I only use their codes. One small loop reads the string and draws all the shapes with patch. Now the whole scene costs about one character per number.
One warning from my own mistake: use double(char(z)), not double(z). If z is a string, double(z) gives NaN. My first test showed an empty table because of this.
I kept the readable list of shapes in a separate file, and it writes the packed strings for me.
I Had Help
I worked with an AI assistant the whole way. It read the validator with me, tested many small ideas fast, measured which part of the code cost the most, and rewrote code again and again without getting tired.
But the AI did not decide what the game is. It could tell me that the dog costs 1,700 characters. It could not tell me if the dog is worth it. Every "keep" or "cut" was my choice. I think this is the best way to work with AI: let it do the heavy lifting, and keep the decisions for yourself.
The Result
The validator now says 9,936 characters. The game still has Dad, THE LOOK, Mom's warnings, the family walking out, the ranks, and fifteen jokes.
My advice: run minihackContest.validate early. Do not count the characters yourself, because the validator does not count your file. It counts the clean version of your file.
I hope you have found this helpful. Thank you for reading.
3 Kommentare
Zeit (absteigend)
Spot on: "the best way to work with AI: let it do the heavy lifting, and keep the decisions for yourself."
'Human in the loop'
This is great! Thanks for sharing your story and such useful tips. One of the goals for the contest is to explore Agentic AI coding while having fun. You learn most by doing.
Anmelden, um teilzunehmen
Tags
